Answer:
The US and Britain used planes and other aircrafts to get food, water, medicine, and other supplies to supply West Berlin during the Berlin blockade.
what did u.s. policy in the middle east between 1945 and 1959 cause?
Answer: it caused a coup that happened to bring the Shah of Iran into power
Explanation:
which of the following was a major result of the civil war
Answer:
the role that was played by Botha's at United democratic front
whose hotel on west 53rd street was the center of black bohemia in new york before the first world war?
The hotel on West 53rd Street that was the center of black bohemia in New York before the First World War was the Hotel Theresa. This historic hotel served as a cultural hub for African American intellectuals, artists, musicians, and activists during the early 20th century.
Located in the Harlem neighborhood, the Hotel Theresa became a symbol of black cultural and social life in New York City. It provided a space for prominent figures such as Langston Hughes, W.E.B. Du Bois, Duke Ellington, and Malcolm X to gather and exchange ideas.
The hotel's famous Club Harlem attracted musicians and entertainers, contributing to the vibrant jazz and nightlife scene of the era. The Hotel Theresa played a significant role in shaping the cultural and intellectual landscape of black America before World War I.
To learn more about black bohemia click here
brainly.com/question/24251743
#SPJ11
Question
Which is true of Hindu architecture?
OA. No gold was used in Hindu buildings.
B. By showing ideals, it pointed Hindus to an ideal state.
C. Buildings were made only of precious stones.
D. Because it was forbidden, it never showed the gods.
SUBMIT
A
Answer:
B. By showing ideals, it pointed Hindus to an ideal state.
Explanation:
hope this helps
which of the following places witnessed joan of arc’s first victory as part of the french army under king charles vii?
The city of Orléans witnessed Joan of Arc's first victory as part of the French army under King Charles VII.
Orléans was a strategic stronghold during the Hundred Years' War between France and England. The English had laid siege to Orléans, and the city was on the brink of falling into their hands.
Joan of Arc, a young French peasant girl who claimed to have been divinely guided, joined the French forces to help lift the siege. She inspired and rallied the troops, displaying remarkable leadership and bravery. Under her guidance, the French army successfully defended Orléans and won a significant victory against the English. This triumph marked a turning point in the war and boosted the morale of the French forces.
Joan of Arc's victory at Orléans demonstrated her military prowess and provided a much-needed boost to King Charles VII's claim to the French throne. It paved the way for subsequent successes and eventually led to Charles VII's coronation as the rightful king of France.
To learn more about King Charles VII visit
brainly.com/question/17975113
#SPJ11
delegates who had been sent to the 1787 constitutional convention in philadelphia were specifically authorized to ______.
The delegates who were sent to the 1787 Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia were specifically authorized to revise the Articles of Confederation.
The purpose of the Constitutional Convention held in Philadelphia in 1787 was to address the shortcomings of the existing government under the Articles of Confederation. The delegates were authorized by their respective states to meet and propose revisions to the Articles.
However, as the Convention progressed, it became apparent that a more substantial overhaul of the government was needed, leading to the creation of an entirely new Constitution.
While the delegates were not explicitly authorized to draft a new constitution, they understood the necessity of significant changes to establish a more effective and balanced system of government, which ultimately resulted in the drafting and adoption of the United States Constitution.
To learn more about constitutional convention click here: brainly.com/question/8863425
#SPJ11
how was andrew jacksons election and presidency viewed by the rich and well born by the common people? by the native americans? by the supporters of states right?
Andrew Jackson's election and presidency were viewed differently by different groups. The rich and well-born were generally opposed to Jackson's populist policies and saw him as a threat to their power and influence.
The rich and well-born were generally opposed to Jackson's populist policies and saw him as a threat to their power and influence. They viewed him as a demagogue who would undermine the stability of the country and the integrity of the government.
The common people, on the other hand, supported Jackson and saw him as a champion of their interests. They appreciated his efforts to expand voting rights and his attacks on the wealthy elite. They saw him as a man of the people who would fight for their rights and improve their lives.
Native Americans viewed Jackson's presidency as a disaster. He signed the Indian Removal Act, which forced them to leave their ancestral lands and move to Indian Territory (present-day Oklahoma). This policy resulted in the Trail of Tears, a forced migration that led to the deaths of thousands of Native Americans.
Supporters of states' rights generally supported Jackson's presidency. They saw him as a defender of states' rights and an opponent of federal power. Jackson's opposition to the Second Bank of the United States and his use of the veto power to block legislation he disagreed with were seen as evidence of his commitment to limited government and states' rights.
To know more about Andrew Jackson visit
https://brainly.com/question/351162
#SPJ11
briefly explain one specific historical example of how the cold war fluctuated between periods of confrontation and peaceful existence during the 1950s
One specific historical example of how the Cold War fluctuated between periods of confrontation and peaceful existence during the 1950s is the "Thaw" period in Soviet-American relations.
The Thaw refers to a period of relative relaxation and improved relations between the United States and the Soviet Union from the mid-1950s to the early 1960s. This period followed the intense confrontation of the early Cold War years, marked by events such as the Berlin Blockade, the Korean War, and the Cuban Missile Crisis.
One significant event during the Thaw was the Geneva Summit in 1955. At this summit, leaders from the United States, the Soviet Union, France, and the United Kingdom met to discuss important issues and work towards easing tensions. The summit resulted in several agreements, including the establishment of diplomatic relations between the Soviet Union and Austria, the release of prisoners from both sides, and discussions on nuclear disarmament.
Another notable event was the visit of Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev to the United States in 1959. During his visit, Khrushchev engaged in high-level meetings with President Dwight D. Eisenhower, visited various American cities, and engaged in public debates. This visit created a sense of optimism and a belief that peaceful coexistence between the two superpowers was possible. The fluctuation between confrontation and peaceful existence during the 1950s reflects the complex nature of the Cold War. While there were moments of détente and a desire for cooperation, the underlying ideological and strategic differences between the United States and the Soviet Union remained, often leading to periods of renewed hostility.
To learn more about Cold War click here: brainly.com/question/12698715
#SPJ11
Write a short essay in which you explain how José de San Martín and Simón Bolívar changed life in South America
José de San Martín and Simón Bolívar were two prominent figures who played instrumental roles in the liberation of South America from Spanish colonial rule during the early 19th century.
Bolívar's impact extended beyond military victories. He had a profound influence on shaping the political landscape of South America. Bolívar championed the ideals of republicanism, democracy, and constitutionalism. He advocated for the creation of representative governments that would ensure the participation and voice of the people. Bolívar's vision included the preservation of individual liberties, the abolition of slavery, and the pursuit of social justice.
The contributions of José de San Martín and Simón Bolívar to the liberation of South America and the subsequent transformations they brought were profound. Their military victories led to the establishment of independent nations, while their political ideologies and reforms aimed to create more just and inclusive societies. The legacies of San Martín and Bolívar continue to inspire and shape the identity and aspirations of South Americans today, serving as reminders of the struggle for freedom and the ongoing quest for social progress in the region.
Learn more about democracy here:
https://brainly.com/question/30466950
#SPJ11
How did the Vietnam war play a role in the Cold War
Answer:
The Vietnam War played a significant role in the Cold War, which was the ideological, economic, and political struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union that lasted from the end of World War II in 1945 until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.
The United States became involved in the Vietnam War in the 1960s as a way to prevent the spread of communism in Southeast Asia. The fear was that if communism spread in Vietnam, it would lead to a domino effect in which other countries in the region would also fall to communism. The United States saw itself as the defender of democracy and capitalism against the spread of communism, and the Vietnam War was seen as a crucial battle in that struggle.
The Soviet Union, on the other hand, supported the communist government in North Vietnam and supplied it with military aid. The Vietnam War, therefore, became a proxy war between the United States and the Soviet Union, with each side supporting opposing forces. The war was also part of a larger struggle between the two superpowers for influence around the world.
The Vietnam War was a costly and divisive conflict for the United States, both in terms of human lives and resources. The war highlighted the limits of American power and influence, and it contributed to a growing disillusionment with the government and the military among many Americans. It also led to a shift in American foreign policy, with a greater emphasis on diplomacy and engagement with other countries rather than military intervention.
In the context of the Cold War, the Vietnam War was an important chapter in the struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union, and it had significant consequences for both countries and for the world as a whole.
Get more information about this at:
https://brainly.com/question/11375126
#SPJ6
which of the following regions saw the greatest railroad growth between 1870 and 1890? A. The Pacific Coast
B. The Rocky Mountains
C. The Great Plains
D. The Atlantic seaboard
The greatest railroad growth between 1870 and 1890 was seen in the Great Plains region. The expansion of railroads played a crucial role in the development and transformation of the region during that period.
The Great Plains region experienced the most significant railroad growth between 1870 and 1890. This expansion was driven by several factors. Firstly, the Homestead Act of 1862, which granted land to settlers, attracted a large number of farmers to the region. As a result, there was a growing demand for transportation to move agricultural products to markets. Railroads provided an efficient and reliable means of transportation, leading to their rapid development.
Secondly, the federal government supported the expansion of railroads through land grants and subsidies. This encouraged railroad companies to extend their lines into the Great Plains, connecting the region with other parts of the country. The transcontinental railroads, such as the Union Pacific and the Central Pacific, played a vital role in linking the Great Plains with the rest of the United States.
The railroad growth in the Great Plains facilitated the settlement and economic development of the region. It opened up new opportunities for trade, allowed for the transportation of goods and people over long distances, and contributed to the growth of towns and cities along the railroad lines.
To learn more about railroad click here: brainly.com/question/10678575
#SPJ11
TRUE OR FALSE the behistun cliff inscriptions unlocked the understanding of many other cuneiform scripts.
True. The Behistun cliff inscriptions played a crucial role in unlocking the understanding of many other cuneiform scripts.
Explanation:
The Behistun cliff inscriptions, also known as the Behistun Inscription, are a set of inscriptions carved into a cliff in Iran. They were created by Darius the Great, the king of the Achaemenid Empire, around 520 BCE. The inscriptions are written in three different cuneiform scripts: Old Persian, Elamite, and Babylonian.
The Behistun inscriptions played a crucial role in unlocking the understanding of many other cuneiform scripts. Prior to the decipherment of the Behistun inscriptions, cuneiform writing was largely undecipherable. The inscriptions provided a key to deciphering cuneiform writing, which was used by various ancient civilizations in the Near East.
By studying the Behistun inscriptions, scholars were able to decipher the grammar, vocabulary, and syntax of cuneiform scripts. This breakthrough allowed for the decipherment of other cuneiform texts from different time periods and regions. The translations of the Behistun inscriptions opened up a wealth of knowledge about ancient civilizations and their languages.
Learn more about the significance of the behistun cliff inscriptions in understanding cuneiform scripts here:
https://brainly.com/question/28145411
#SPJ11
AID TO LEARNING Explain how each of the following factors helped to bring about opposition to British rule by 1857. A. Political B. Religious and Social C. Economic D. Military
There are the terms which helped to bring opposition to british rule by 1857.
A. Political Factors:
Lack of representation: The political factor contributing to opposition to British rule was the absence of Indian representation in the governance system.Disruption of traditional political structures: The British dismantled or undermined existing Indian political structures, such as the Mughal Empire, princely states, and regional powers.B. Religious and Social Factors:
Cultural and religious suppression: The British colonial administration imposed policies that infringed upon religious and social customs of Indians. Sepoy grievances: The British Indian Army, comprised largely of Indian sepoys (soldiers), witnessed instances of religious insensitivity and discrimination by the British officers.C. Economic Factors:
Economic exploitation: British rule was characterized by economic exploitation, including land reforms, taxation policies, and commercial exploitation of Indian resources.Deindustrialization and loss of economic autonomy: British policies favored the export of raw materials from India and the import of manufactured goods from Britain.D. Military Factors:
Discrimination and low prospects: The British administration maintained a hierarchical structure within the military, where Indian soldiers were often subject to discrimination.Disbanding of native armies: In certain regions, the British disbanded or downsized existing native armies, leading to unemployment and a loss of status for soldiers.for similar questions on opposition to british.
https://brainly.com/question/24203811
#SPJ8
true/false. virtually no one acknowledged galileo's work during his lifetime.
Answer: False
Explanation:
Answer:
True
Explanation:A lot of Galileo’s ideas were rejected because the church didn’t accept them
Your life today is very different from the lives of your grandparents decades ago. How you live now also differs from how your grandchildren will live 50 years in the future.
Changes in our environment, government, economy, and immigration patterns have varied greatly and caused remarkable advancements that people from 50 years ago could never imagine.
Write a letter to a young person who lived 50 years in the past. Tell a story about what your typical day is like and describing how all these changes (technology, environment, governments, etc.) have affected your way of life. Be sure to include specific details and examples to make your world come to life for them. Your essay should have an introduction, body, and conclusion.
Dear Young Friend,
I am writing to you from a world that has undergone remarkable transformations in the past 50 years. Technology, environment, government, and immigration patterns have revolutionized our lives. I wake up to the melody of a sleek alarm clock, drive an electric car, work in a diverse environment, rely on smartphones for communication, and enjoy virtual reality entertainment. Our world today is vastly different, and I can only imagine the incredible changes awaiting future generations.
Warm regards,
[Your Name][tex][/tex]
What are arguments that support the Indian Removal Act?
Arguments in support of the Indian Removal Act included the belief in westward expansion, the desire for economic growth, and the perception of Native American tribes as obstacles to progress. Supporters of the Indian Removal Act put forth several arguments to justify the policy.
One argument was rooted in the ideology of westward expansion, fueled by the belief in Manifest Destiny, which held that it was the destiny of the United States to stretch from coast to coast. Proponents argued that the removal of Native American tribes from their ancestral lands would clear the way for American settlers to expand westward and cultivate new territories.
Another argument in support of the Indian Removal Act was economic growth. Advocates claimed that the presence of Native American tribes hindered economic development, particularly in terms of resource extraction and land utilization. By removing Native Americans and opening up the land for white settlement, supporters argued that economic opportunities would flourish, benefiting the nation as a whole.
Additionally, proponents of the Indian Removal Act viewed Native American tribes as obstacles to progress. They believed that the cultural differences and conflicts between settlers and Native Americans were irreconcilable. Some argued that the forced relocation of tribes to designated Indian Territory (present-day Oklahoma) would promote peace, protect Native Americans from white encroachment, and facilitate the assimilation of Native peoples into American society.
It's important to note that while these arguments were used to support the Indian Removal Act at the time, the policy had devastating consequences for Native American communities, leading to displacement, loss of ancestral lands, and immense suffering.
Learn more about encroachment here :
https://brainly.com/question/32221525
#SPJ11
to fulfill their obligations under the covenant, what did the hebrews have to do? flashcards
These obligations were outlined in the Torah, which is the central text of Judaism and contains the laws and teachings of the Hebrew people. Fulfilling these obligations was seen as a way to maintain a relationship with God and to live a life that was in accordance with God's will.
The covenant between God and the Hebrew people, as described in the Bible, was a set of agreements and obligations that were agreed upon by both parties. The Hebrew people agreed to follow God's laws and commandments, and in return, God promised to bless them and guide them on their journey through life.
To fulfill their obligations under the covenant, the Hebrews had to:
Worship God alone
Follow the laws and commandments given in the Torah
Make regular sacrifices at the Temple in Jerusalem
Pay tithes to support the priests and Levites
Observe Jewish holidays and festivals
Treat others with justice and compassion.
Learn more about obligations Visit: brainly.com/question/28443800
#SPJ4
I have now given the British Government a memorandum with a final German proposal. . . . The contents of this proposal are very simple: The area whose population is German and which wants to join Germany, comes to Germany. . . Right now, immediately! I have selected the border which, based on the information on the demographic and linguistic distribution in Czechoslovakia which has been available for decades, is just. . . . I have also assured [Britain], and I repeat this assurance here, that, once this problem is solved, there exist no further territorial problems for Germany in Europe!. . . My patience is now exhausted! I have made Mr. Benes [the leader of Czechoslovakia] an offer. . . . The decision is in his hands! Peace or war! Either he accepts this offer and finally gives the Germans their freedom, or we will come and take this freedom ourselves! –Speech on the Sudetenland, Adolf Hitler, 1938 What important characteristic related to totalitarianism does this document demonstrate? Germany was reluctant to wage war against its enemies. Germany maintained a strong relationship with Great Britain. Germany was not interested in annexing any territory in Europe. Germany was willing to take an aggressive stance with its neighbors.
This document demonstrates an important characteristic related to totalitarianism, namely that Germany, under Adolf Hitler, was willing to take an aggressive stance with its neighbors. It shows a clear willingness to use force and aggression to achieve territorial and political objectives.
The document contains Adolf Hitler's speech on the Sudetenland, which highlights Germany's aggressive stance towards Czechoslovakia and its willingness to resort to war if its demands are not met. This aggressive stance aligns with a key characteristic of totalitarianism, which is the use of force, intimidation, and coercion to achieve political objectives.
Hitler's speech reflects a disregard for peaceful negotiations and diplomacy. He presents a final German proposal that essentially demands the immediate incorporation of areas with a German population into Germany. He makes explicit threats of war if Czechoslovakia does not accept this proposal and grant Germans their "freedom." This aggressive language and ultimatum illustrate Germany's readiness to use military force to achieve its territorial expansion goals.
This document highlights the expansionist and confrontational nature of Hitler's regime, which sought to assert German dominance over other nations through aggression. It exemplifies the aggressive stance that totalitarian regimes often adopt to achieve their objectives, disregarding the principles of peaceful resolution and respect for the sovereignty of other nations.
Learn more about demonstrates here:
https://brainly.com/question/30638193
#SPJ11
Committees in congress are created and organized by
Answer:
Both the House of Representatives and the Senate maintain three types of committees: standing; select (in the Senate these are called special and select); and joint. Standing committees are permanent committees with specific responsibilities outlined in the rules of each chamber.
Explanation:
How do monsoons affect the Amazon River?
Monsoons affect the Amazon River by increasing rainfall, causing seasonal flooding, impacting ecosystems, and influencing agriculture and transportation.
Monsoons significantly affect the Amazon River, primarily by increasing rainfall during specific periods.
This increased precipitation leads to seasonal flooding, which can cover vast areas of land and cause drastic changes to ecosystems. These floods support a diverse range of flora and fauna, creating unique habitats for various species.
Additionally, the heavy rainfall influences agriculture, as it replenishes soil nutrients and affects crop growth.
The monsoon season also impacts transportation, with higher water levels making certain routes more accessible for boats, while heavy rain and flooding can hinder road travel in the region.
For more such questions on Amazon River, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/1442234
#SPJ11
true or false: some critics consider indra gandhi too autocratic because she seized emergency powers
True, Some critics consider Indira Gandhi too autocratic because she seized emergency powers.
Rule of Indira GandhiDuring her tenure as the Prime Minister of India Indira Gandhi declared a state of emergency in 1975 which granted her extensive powers to govern the country. this move was seen by many critics as an autocratic act, as it allowed Gandhi to bypass democratic processes and curtail civil liberties.
Under the emergency powers Gandhi suspended fundamental rights, censored the media, arrested political opponents and centralized control over the government. These actions were viewed as an authoritarian consolidation of power, with critics arguing that Gandhi's actions undermined democratic principles and concentrated excessive power in the hands of the Prime Minister.
Learn more about Indira Gandhi at
https://brainly.com/question/22347540
#SPJ1
Identify and explain ONE continuity in European family life from 1700 through 1900.
One continuity in European family life from 1700 through 1900 was the patriarchal structure and the dominant role of men within the family.
Throughout this period, European society upheld the notion of male authority and the expectation that men would be the head of the household. Men held power over important decision-making, controlled family finances, and were responsible for representing the family in public matters. Women, on the other hand, were primarily confined to domestic roles, taking care of the household, raising children, and supporting their husbands. This patriarchal system was reinforced by societal norms, religious teachings, and legal frameworks that upheld male dominance.
Learn more about the patriarchal structure here:
https://brainly.com/question/30001989
#SPJ11
by the early sixteenth century, the portuguese controlled a major commercial empire in
By the early sixteenth century, the Portuguese controlled a major commercial empire in several regions around the world.
Their empire was primarily focused on maritime trade and exploration, and they had established a vast network of trading posts and colonies. The Portuguese empire reached its peak during the Age of Discovery, when Portuguese explorers ventured into new territories and established trading relationships.One of the most significant areas under Portuguese control was the Indian Ocean. Portuguese navigators, such as Vasco da Gama, successfully sailed around the Cape of Good Hope and reached India in 1498. They established fortified trading posts along the western coast of India, including Goa, Calicut, and Malacca, which became important centers for trade with the East.
In addition to the Indian Ocean, the Portuguese also controlled territories in Africa, particularly along the coasts. They established trading posts and forts along the western and eastern coasts of Africa, including places like Angola, Mozambique, and the island of São Tomé. These coastal outposts served as bases for trade in gold, ivory, spices, and enslaved people.
Furthermore, the Portuguese had a significant presence in the Atlantic Ocean and the Americas. They colonized islands in the Atlantic, such as the Azores, Madeira, and Cape Verde, which played a crucial role as stopping points for transatlantic voyages. In the Americas, the Portuguese claimed Brazil as their colony in 1500, where they established sugar plantations and engaged in the slave trade.
Overall, the Portuguese commercial empire in the early sixteenth century encompassed territories and trade routes across the Indian Ocean, Africa, the Atlantic, and the Americas. Their dominance in maritime exploration and trade laid the foundation for their economic and political influence during that period.
To learn more about Portuguese click here: brainly.com/question/3199978
#SPJ11
if the industry were served by a pure monopoly, the deadweight loss would be the area _____.
If the industry were served by a pure monopoly, the deadweight loss would be the area between the demand curve and the monopolist's marginal cost curve, from the monopolist's output level to the competitive output level.
This represents the loss of economic welfare that occurs when the monopolist restricts output and charges a higher price than the competitive market price. In a competitive market, price and quantity are determined by the intersection of the demand and supply curves.
However, in a monopoly, the monopolist has market power and can set the price and quantity to maximize their profit. This results in a higher price and lower output than would occur in a competitive market, which creates a deadweight loss.
The deadweight loss is a measure of the inefficiency of the market, as resources are not being allocated efficiently. Some consumers who value the product more than the monopolist's price are not able to purchase it, while some potential producers who could produce the product at a lower cost than the monopolist are not able to enter the market.
In summary, the deadweight loss in a pure monopoly is the area between the demand curve and the monopolist's marginal cost curve from the monopolist's output level to the competitive output level.
This represents the loss of economic welfare that occurs when the monopolist restricts output and charges a higher price than the competitive market price, resulting in an inefficient allocation of resources.
To know more about monopoly refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/27324976#
#SPJ11
We use many types of natural resources for energy. Identify each type of natural resource as renewable or nonrenewable. sunlight,oil,natural gas,wind,coal,water
What empire was east of Athens and Sparta
The Athenian empire was east of Athens and Sparta. The eastern Greeks on the mainland and in the islands felt especially exposed and turned to Sparta, their natural leader.
Ionia's Greek residents were to be evacuated and relocated somewhere under the Spartans' proposed solution, which was unsatisfactory because it would have usurped Athens' colonial or pseudocolonial position and been upsetting for the victims. The Greek coalition welcomed the inhabitants of Samos, Chios, Lesbos, and other islands. The fate of the mainlanders was briefly uncertain, but not for long: in early 478, Athens, acting independently, seized Sestus, which had previously been under tenuous Persian rule.
To know more about The Athenian empire, click:
https://brainly.com/question/1393808
#SPJ1
How did the U.S.’s stance to remain isolated shift from neutral to getting involved in war as a result of Hitler and Tojo's (and Hirohito’s) actions of expansion and aggression from 1933 - 1941 (up to the Pearl Harbor attack)?
The U.S.'s stance of remaining isolated shifted from neutrality to getting involved in war as a result of Hitler and Tojo's actions of expansion and aggression from 1933 to 1941.
During this period, the U.S. initially pursued a policy of neutrality, aiming to stay out of the conflicts unfolding in Europe and Asia. However, Hitler's rise to power in Germany and Tojo's aggressive actions in Japan gradually eroded the U.S.'s commitment to isolationism.
As Hitler's Nazi regime embarked on a series of aggressive territorial expansions and the suppression of human rights, it became increasingly clear that the U.S. could no longer afford to remain neutral. The invasion of Poland in 1939 and subsequent invasions of other European countries highlighted the threat posed by Nazi Germany and its disregard for international norms.
Similarly, Japan's aggression in Asia, particularly its invasion of China in 1937 and later its occupation of French Indochina, raised concerns about the expansionist ambitions of the Japanese Empire.
These actions, combined with the growing realization that Hitler and Tojo's expansionist goals posed a direct threat to U.S. interests and security, ultimately pushed the U.S. to abandon its policy of isolation and enter World War II following the attack on Pearl Harbor in December 1941. The attack on Pearl Harbor by the Japanese forces served as a catalyst that united the American public and prompted a declaration of war against Japan, and subsequently, Germany and Italy, leading to the U.S.'s active involvement in the war.
Learn more about Hitler's Nazi regime
https://brainly.com/question/31875102
#SPJ11
What combination of materials were used to make the weapons and pieces of armor both strong and flexible?
(question is referring to Japanese samurais)
Japanese samurai weapons and armor were crafted using a combination of materials to achieve a balance of strength and flexibility.
The specific materials varied over time as advancements were made, but generally, the following combination was common:
1. Steel: The core material for the blades of samurai swords (katana) and other weapons was high-quality steel. The steel used in Japanese swords was known for its sharpness, durability, and flexibility. Different types of steel were used, such as tamahagane, which was made from iron sand and carbon, and had distinct properties that allowed for the creation of sharp and resilient blades.
2. Iron and Leather: The armor worn by samurai, known as "yoroi," consisted of various components such as the chest plate (dō), shoulder guards (sode), arm guards (kote), and leg guards (suneate). These parts were constructed using iron or steel plates connected by leather or silk lacing, providing both protection and flexibility.
3. Silk: Silk fabric was widely used in the construction of samurai armor. It was used to connect and reinforce various components of the armor, such as attaching the metal plates together or providing a base for attaching decorative elements. Silk was chosen for its strength, lightweight nature, and ability to absorb impact.
4. Bamboo: Bamboo was utilized in crafting protective elements of samurai armor, particularly for the face mask (menpo) and the helmet (kabuto). Bamboo strips were woven together to form a strong yet flexible framework, which was then covered with lacquered plates or fabric.
These combinations of materials allowed the samurai weapons and armor to possess qualities of both strength and flexibility, crucial for effective combat. The use of high-quality steel for blades, the combination of iron or steel plates with leather or silk lacing for armor, and the incorporation of silk and bamboo in specific components contributed to the desired balance of durability, maneuverability, and protection.
Learn more about corporation here:
https://brainly.com/question/30029715
#SPJ11
As the Civil War progressed, millions of northerners who had not been abolitionists became convinced that preserving the Union as an embodiment of liberty required the destruction of slavery.
A. True
B. False
The fact that as the Civil War progressed, many Northerners who had not initially been abolitionists became convinced that preserving the Union and the principles of liberty it represented required the destruction of slavery is true. Because the demand for change grew as the conflict intensified, and the Union needed to adapt its goals to ensure success.
Initially, the primary goal of the Union was to preserve the nation by preventing Southern states from seceding. However, as the war continued, it became increasingly clear that slavery was a central issue fueling the conflict.
Abolitionists played a significant role in influencing public opinion in the North, and the Emancipation Proclamation further solidified the connection between the war and the fight against slavery.
By associating the preservation of the Union with the abolition of slavery, many Northerners began to see the fight for liberty and equality as an essential part of the war effort.
As a result, millions of Northerners who had not previously considered themselves abolitionists came to support the cause and the eventual end of slavery in the United States.
Learn more about the Civil War: https://brainly.com/question/29766424
#SPJ11
European Allies argued that Germany had to pay reparations in excess of war damages.
Answer:
roughly 300 billion.
Explanation:
This was supposed to help the victories nations money to rebuild after the devastating war. This made Germans angry and eventually led to WW2.