A man shares a $1,200,00 inheritance between his 3 sons in ratio 1: 3: 6. Calculate the difference between the largest share and the smallest share

A 4x6 matrix is a rectangular array of numbers with 4 rows and 6 columns. The elements of the matrix are typically denoted by a letter with subscripts indicating the row and column.

The rank of a matrix is the dimension of the vector space spanned by its columns or rows. It is also equal to the number of linearly independent columns or rows of the matrix.

Since A is a 4x6 matrix, the largest possible value for the rank of A is min(4, 6), which is 4x4 identity matrix or 4 if there are 4 linearly independent rows or columns in A.

To find the rank of A, we can perform row operations on A to reduce it to row echelon form or reduced row echelon form. Row operations include adding a multiple of one row to another row, multiplying a row by a non-zero scalar, and swapping two rows.

After performing the row operations, the number of non-zero rows in the resulting matrix is the rank of A. Since the rank of a matrix is equal to the rank of its transpose, we can also perform column operations to find the rank of A.

Therefore, the answer is (a) 4, as it is the largest possible value for the rank of a 4x6 matrix.

To know more about 4x6 matrix visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31047345

#SPJ11

The required percentage increase is 81%.We need to increase the sample size by 81%.

Suppose a random sample of size n is required to produce a margin of error of[tex]$\pm E$.[/tex]

The margin of error is given by the formula :

[tex]$E=\frac{z_{\frac{\alpha}{2}}\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}$$\frac{z_{\frac{\alpha}{2}}\sigma}{E}=\sqrt{n}$.[/tex]

The above equation  is considered as equation(1)

So, for margin of error

[tex], $\pm\frac{9}{10}E$,$\frac{z_{\frac{\alpha}{2}}\sigma}{\frac{9}{10}E}=\sqrt{n_1}$[/tex]

The above equation  is considered as equation (2)

Divide equation (2) by (1) to find the increase in percent.

[tex]$\frac{\frac{z_{\frac{\alpha}{2}}\sigma}{\frac{9}{10}E}}{\frac{z_{\frac{\alpha}{2}}\sigma}{E}}=\frac{\sqrt{n_1}}{\sqrt{n}}$ $ \Rightarrow\frac{1}{\frac{9}{10}}=\frac{\sqrt{n_1}}{\sqrt{n}}$$\Rightarrow\frac{\sqrt{n}}{\sqrt{n_1}}=\frac{10}{9}$ $\Rightarrow\frac{n}{n_1}=\left(\frac{10}{9}\right)^2$$\Rightarrow\frac{n_1}{n}=\frac{81}{100}$[/tex]

We need to increase the sample size by

[tex]$\frac{n_1}{n}=\frac{81}{100}=81\%$[/tex]

To know more about sample size,visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30100088

#SPJ11

For a standardized normal distribution, p(z<0.3) and p(z≤0.3) are equal because the normal distribution is continuous.

In a standardized normal distribution, probabilities of individual points are calculated based on the area under the curve. Since the distribution is continuous, the probability of a single point occurring is zero, which means p(z<0.3) and p(z≤0.3) will yield the same value.

To find these probabilities, you can use a z-table or software to look up the cumulative probability for z=0.3. You will find that both p(z<0.3) and p(z≤0.3) are approximately 0.6179, indicating that 61.79% of the data lies below z=0.3 in a standardized normal distribution.

To know more about standardized normal distribution click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29509087#

#SPJ11

Explanation:

1. Suppose n is an even positive integer. This means that n is a whole number greater than zero and can be divided by 2 without leaving a remainder. In other words, n = 2k, where k is a whole number.
Then we can write n as 2k, where k is a positive integer. To give a big estimate for n, we can say that n is at least as large as 2, since 2 is the smallest even positive integer. Therefore, the big estimate for n is that it could be any even positive integer greater than or equal.

An integer is positive then, it is greater than zero, and negative so it is less than zero. Zero is defined as neither negative nor positive. Only positive integers were considered, making the term synonymous with the natural numbers. The definition of integer expanded over time to include negative numbers as their usefulness was recognized.[
Now, let's estimate a value for n:
2. To give a big estimate for n, we can consider a large value for k. For example, if we take k = 1000, then n = 2(1000) = 2000. So, a big estimate for n could be 2000. Keep in mind that this is just an example, and there are many larger even positive integers you could choose.

To know more about positive integers. Click on the link.

https://brainly.com/question/13733829

#SPJ11

We can prove the inequality using the isoperimetric inequality.

Let C be the closed curve and let A be the region enclosed by the curve. Consider a circle of radius r such that A is completely contained in the interior of the circle. By definition of A, the circle has area equal to A, i.e., πr^2 = A. The circumference of the circle is 2πr.

Now, since C is the boundary of A, its length p must be greater than or equal to the circumference of the circle. That is, p ≥ 2πr. Squaring both sides, we get p^2 ≥ 4π^2r^2.

But we know that A = πr^2, so r^2 = A/π. Substituting this in the above inequality, we get:

p^2 ≥ 4πA

This is the desired result, i.e., p^2 is greater than or equal to 4π times the area enclosed by the curve.

Learn more about curve here:

https://brainly.com/question/28793630

#SPJ11

This polynomial function has a fifth degree, 33 as a zero of multiplicity 4, -2 as the only other zero, and a leading coefficient of 22.

We construct a polynomial function with the given properties.
The polynomial function is of fifth degree, which means it has 5 roots or zeros.
One of the zeros is 33 with a multiplicity of 4.

This means that 33 is a root 4 times.
The only other zero is -2 (ignoring the extra -2).
The leading coefficient is 22.
Now we can construct the polynomial function using these properties:
Start with the root 33 and its multiplicity 4:
[tex](x - 33)^4[/tex]
Include the other zero, -2:
[tex](x - 33)^4 \times  (x + 2)[/tex]
Add the leading coefficient, 22:
[tex]f(x) = 22(x - 33)^4 \times  (x + 2)[/tex].

For similar question on polynomial function.

https://brainly.com/question/2833285

#SPJ11

The equation of the polynomial function is f(x) = 2(x - 3)⁴(x + 2)

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The properties of the polynomial

From the properties  of the polynomial, we have the following highlights

So, we have

f(x) = (x - zero) with an exponent of the multiplicity

Using the above as a guide, we have the following:

f(x) = 2(x - 3)⁴(x + 2)

Hence, the equation of the polynomial function is f(x) = 2(x - 3)⁴(x + 2)

Read more about polynomial at

brainly.com/question/7693326

#SPJ4

The set on which h is continuous is { (x, y) | 5x + 4y > 20 }. The function f(x, y) is a linear function and is defined for all values of x and y.

To determine the set on which h is continuous, we need to examine the domains of the functions f(x, y) and g(t), as well as the composition of these functions.

The function f(x, y) is a linear function and is defined for all values of x and y. The function g(t) is defined for all non-negative values of t (i.e., t ≥ 0), since it involves the square root of t.

The composition g(f(x, y)) is then defined for all (x, y) such that 5x + 4y - 20 ≥ 0, since f(x, y) must be non-negative for g(f(x, y)) to be defined. Simplifying this inequality, we get 5x + 4y > 20, which is the set on which g(f(x, y)) is defined.

Finally, the function h(x, y) = g(f(x, y)) is a composition of two continuous functions, and is therefore continuous on the set on which g(f(x, y)) is defined. Therefore, the set on which h is continuous is { (x, y) | 5x + 4y > 20 }.

Learn more about linear function here

https://brainly.com/question/2248255

#SPJ11

The parenting style described, where parents set few controls on their children's television viewing, allowing freedom and individual limits without punishment, is referred to as a permissive parenting style. Correct option is C).

A permissive parenting style is characterized by parents who set few rules, limits, or controls on their children's behavior. In the context of television viewing, permissive parents give their children the freedom to set their own limits and make decisions regarding what they watch without imposing strict rules or regulations.

In this style, parents may prioritize their child's autonomy and independence, allowing them to make choices without much interference or guidance. They may be lenient when it comes to enforcing rules or punishing improper behavior related to television viewing.

Permissive parents typically have a more relaxed approach and may prioritize maintaining a positive and harmonious relationship with their children rather than strict control. While this approach allows children to have more freedom and independence, it may also lead to challenges in establishing discipline and boundaries.

Therefore, based on the given description, the parenting style exemplified is permissive, where parents set few controls on their children's television viewing and allow individual limits without punishment.

Learn more about parenting style here:

https://brainly.com/question/28260043

#SPJ11

A new algorithm for depth-first search (DFS) can be designed without recursion by using a stack data structure. The stack will keep track of the nodes visited and the current path being traversed. The algorithm will start at the root node, push it onto the stack, and loop while the stack is not empty. In each iteration, the top node on the stack will be popped, marked as visited, and its unvisited neighbors will be pushed onto the stack. This process will continue until all nodes have been visited.

The depth-first search algorithm is used to traverse graphs or trees and explore as far as possible along each branch before backtracking. The traditional DFS algorithm uses recursion, which can cause issues with memory and stack overflow for larger data sets. To avoid these issues, a new algorithm can be designed using a stack to keep track of the nodes visited and their paths.

The algorithm will start at the root node and push it onto the stack. It will then loop while the stack is not empty, popping the top node off the stack and marking it as visited. The algorithm will then check the unvisited neighbors of the popped node and push them onto the stack. This process will continue until all nodes have been visited.

A new DFS algorithm can be designed using a stack data structure instead of recursion. The algorithm will start at the root node and loop while the stack is not empty. It will pop the top node off the stack, mark it as visited, and push its unvisited neighbors onto the stack. This process will continue until all nodes have been visited. By using a stack instead of recursion, this algorithm can handle larger data sets without causing memory or stack overflow issues.

To know more about depth-first search visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30465798

#SPJ11

The percentage change in the average cost of a gallon of gas in 2014 was 30%. This means that the cost of a gallon of gas decreased by 30% from January to December 2014.

To calculate the percentage change in the average cost of a gallon of gas in 2014, we have to use the formula for percentage change, which is

= (new value - old value) / old value * 100

The old value, in this case, is the average cost of a gallon of gas in January 2014, which is $3.42, and the new value is the average cost of a gallon of gas in December 2014, which is $2.36. When we substitute these values into the formula, we get

=  ($2.36 - $3.42) / $3.42 * 100

= -30.4%.

This means that there was a decrease of 30.4% in the average cost of a gallon of gas from January to December in 2014. However, we are supposed to round to the nearest percent. Since the hundredth place is 0.4, greater than or equal to 0.5, we round up the tenth place, giving us -30.0%.

Since we are asked for the percentage change, we drop the negative sign and conclude that the percentage change in the average cost of a gallon of gas in 2014 was 30%. The percentage change in the average cost of a gallon of gas in 2014 was 30%.

This means that the cost of a gallon of gas decreased by 30% from January to December 2014. We rounded the result to the nearest percent, which gave us -30.0%, but since we are interested in the percentage change, we dropped the negative sign to get 30%.

To know more about the percentage change, visit:

brainly.com/question/31643226

#SPJ11

Health outcomes based on age-specific mortality rates seem identical among people living in Boston and those living in New Haven, even though those living in Boston are hospitalized about 1.5 times more often than those living in New Haven.

It may seem that hospital care has no ability to improve health based on the information given. However, a few possible explanations might help explain the data.First, it is important to note that hospitalization rates might be an imperfect proxy for health outcomes. People living in Boston might have more access to healthcare or preventive measures than those living in New Haven.

Thus, despite having higher hospitalization rates, people living in Boston might actually be healthier than those living in New Haven.

Therefore, their similar age-specific mortality rates might reflect this.Second, the quality of healthcare might differ between Boston and New Haven. Although hospital care has the potential to improve health, differences in the quality of healthcare might explain the lack of differences in age-specific mortality rates. People living in Boston might receive lower-quality healthcare than those living in New Haven. If this were the case, it might offset any benefits from being hospitalized more frequently.

Finally, it is possible that hospital care does not have a significant impact on health outcomes. For example, hospitalization might only provide short-term relief but not have a meaningful impact on long-term health outcomes. Alternatively, hospitalization might be associated with negative health outcomes, such as complications from surgery or infections acquired in the hospital.

In either case, the hospitalization rate might not be a good indicator of the impact of healthcare on health outcomes.In conclusion, the similar age-specific mortality rates among people living in Boston and New Haven, despite differences in hospitalization rates, might reflect a variety of factors. While hospital care has the potential to improve health, differences in healthcare access, healthcare quality, or the impact of hospitalization on health outcomes might explain the observed data.

To know more about Health visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32037133

#SPJ11

(a) The orthogonal projection Ps: V + S from V onto S is a linear map. To prove this, we need to show that (au + Bu) - (a Ps(u) + BPs(v)) is orthogonal to S, where a and b are scalars, u and v are vectors in V, and Ps(u) and Ps(v) are the orthogonal projections of u and v onto S, respectively. (b) Assuming {V1, V2, ..., Vn} is an orthonormal basis for V and {V1, V2, ..., Vk} spans S, we need to find the matrix representation of Ps with respect to this basis.

(a) To show that Ps: V + S from V onto S is a linear map, we need to verify that it satisfies the properties of linearity. Let u and v be vectors in V, and let a and b be scalars. The orthogonal projection of u onto S is Ps(u), and the orthogonal projection of v onto S is Ps(v). We want to show that (au + Bu) - (a Ps(u) + BPs(v)) is orthogonal to S. To do this, we can show that their inner product with any vector in S is zero. Since the inner product is linear, we can distribute and factor out scalars to prove that (au + Bu) - (a Ps(u) + BPs(v)) is orthogonal to S. Therefore, Ps is a linear map.

(b) Assuming {V1, V2, ..., Vn} is an orthonormal basis for V, we can represent the vector u as a linear combination of the basis vectors: u = a1V1 + a2V2 + ... + anVn. The orthogonal projection of u onto S, Ps(u), is given by the sum of the projections of u onto each basis vector of S: Ps(u) = Ps(a1V1) + Ps(a2V2) + ... + Ps(anVn). Since the basis {V1, V2, ..., Vk} spans S, we only need to consider the projections of u onto the first k basis vectors. The matrix representation of Ps with respect to this basis is obtained by writing down the coefficients of the projections as entries in a matrix. Each column of the matrix represents the projection of the corresponding basis vector onto S.

Learn more about properties of linearity here:

https://brainly.com/question/28709894

#SPJ11

The equation of the curve that passes through the point (0, 1) and whose slope at (x, y) is 17xy is [tex]y = e^{\frac{17}{2} } x^{2}[/tex]

Identify the given information: The point is (0, 1), and the slope at (x, y) is 17xy.
Understand that the slope is the derivative of the function: [tex]\frac{dy}{dx} =  17xy[/tex]

Separate variables to integrate: [tex]\frac{dy}{y} = 17 x dx[/tex]
Integrate both sides with respect to their variables: [tex]\int\limits {\frac{1}{y} } \, dy  = \int\limits {17x} \, dx[/tex]  .

Evaluate the integrals: [tex]ln|y| = (\frac{17}{2} )x^2 + C_{1}[/tex],  where C₁ is the constant of integration.
Solve for y by exponentiating both sides: [tex]y = e^{\frac{17}{2} } x^{2} +C_{1}[/tex].
Use the initial condition (0, 1) to find the value of [tex]C_{1}:1  = e^{0+C_{1}  }[/tex], so C₁ = 0.
Plug the value of C₁ back into the equation: [tex]y = e^{\frac{17}{2} } x^{2}[/tex].

So, the equation of the curve that passes through the point (0, 1) and whose slope at (x, y) is 17xy is [tex]y = e^{\frac{17}{2} } x^{2}[/tex].

To know more about "Slope" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/19131126#

#SPJ11

The maximum value of f(x, y, z) is 250.

To find the maximum value of f(x, y, z), we can use the method of Lagrange multipliers, to find the highest value of given expression.

First, we form the Lagrangian function L(x, y, z, λ) = 5xy + 5xz + 5yz - xyz - λ(x + y + z - 1).

Taking partial derivatives with respect to x, y, z, and λ, and setting them equal to zero, we can solve for the critical points.

After finding these critical points, we can evaluate the function f(x, y, z) at each point and determine the maximum value. In this case, the maximum value is 250.

Learn more about Lagrange multipliers

brainly.com/question/30776684

#SPJ11

A scalar potential function f(x,y), the vector field f(x,y) = x^2 i + y j is conservative.

To show that the vector field f(x,y) = x^2 i + y j is conservative, we need to find a scalar potential function f(x,y) such that grad f(x,y) = f(x,y).

So, let's first calculate the gradient of a potential function f(x,y):

grad f(x,y) = (∂f/∂x) i + (∂f/∂y) j

Assuming that f(x,y) exists, then f(x,y) = ∫∫ f(x,y) dA, where dA = dx dy, the double integral is taken over some region in the xy-plane, and the order of integration does not matter.

Now, we need to find f(x,y) such that the partial derivatives of f(x,y) with respect to x and y match the components of the vector field:

∂f/∂x = x^2

∂f/∂y = y

Integrating the first equation with respect to x gives:

f(x,y) = (1/3)x^3 + g(y)

where g(y) is a constant of integration that depends only on y.

Taking the partial derivative of f(x,y) with respect to y and comparing it to the y-component of the vector field, we get:

∂f/∂y = g'(y) = y

Integrating this equation with respect to y gives:

g(y) = (1/2)y^2 + C

where C is a constant of integration.

Therefore, the scalar potential function is:

f(x,y) = (1/3)x^3 + (1/2)y^2 + C

where C is an arbitrary constant.

Since we have found a scalar potential function f(x,y), the vector field

f(x,y) = x^2 i + y j is conservative.

Learn more about potential function here

https://brainly.com/question/28156550

#SPJ11

This problem can be solved using the concept of the expected value of a random variable. Let X be the random variable representing the number of boxes a person needs to buy to get all four prizes.

To calculate the expected value E(X), we can use the formula:

E(X) = 1/p

where p is the probability of getting a new prize in a single box. In the first box, the person has a 4/4 chance of getting a new prize. In the second box, the person has a 3/4 chance of getting a new prize (since there are only 3 prizes left out of 4). Similarly, in the third box, the person has a 2/4 chance of getting a new prize, and in the fourth box, the person has a 1/4 chance of getting a new prize. Therefore, we have:

p = 4/4 * 3/4 * 2/4 * 1/4 = 3/32

Substituting this into the formula, we get:

E(X) = 1/p = 32/3

Therefore, the average number of boxes a person needs to buy to get all four prizes is 32/3, or approximately 10.67 boxes.

To know more about average refer here

https://brainly.com/question/16956746

SPJ11

c-9 would be an equation that means 9 less than c

The area of the region bounded by the curve and lying in the specified sector is (e^2 - 1)/6 square units.

To calculate the area of the region bounded by the given curve, we use the formula for finding the area of a polar region. This formula is expressed as (1/2)∫[a, b] r(θ)^2 dθ, where r(θ) represents the polar equation of the curve and [a, b] represents the interval of θ values that define the desired sector.

In this case, the polar equation is r = e/2, and the interval of θ values is [π/3, 3π/2]. Plugging these values into the area formula, we get (1/2)∫[π/3, 3π/2] (e/2)^2 dθ. Simplifying further, we have (1/2)∫[π/3, 3π/2] e^2/4 dθ.

Integrating this expression with respect to θ over the given interval and evaluating the definite integral, we obtain the area as (e^2 - 1)/6 square units.

Learn more about square units.

brainly.com/question/24102754

#SPJ11

The amount of kilowatts consumed by a randomly chosen house in the month of February is a continuous random variable since it can take on any non-negative value within a certain range (e.g., 0 to infinity) and can be measured with any level of precision.

#SPJ11

The volume of the given solid is 2592π.

We need to find the volume of the solid enclosed by the paraboloids

y = x^2 + z^2 and y = 72 − x^2 − z^2.

By symmetry, the solid is symmetric about the y-axis, so we can use cylindrical coordinates to set up the triple integral.

The limits of integration for r are 0 to √(72-y), the limits for θ are 0 to 2π, and the limits for y are 0 to 36.

Thus, the triple integral for the volume of the solid is:

V = ∫∫∫ dV

= ∫∫∫ r dr dθ dy (the integrand is 1 since we are just finding the volume)

= ∫₀³⁶ dy ∫₀²π dθ ∫₀^(√(72-y)) r dr

Evaluating this integral, we get:

V = ∫₀³⁶ dy ∫₀²π dθ ∫₀^(√(72-y)) r dr

= ∫₀³⁶ dy ∫₀²π dθ [(1/2)r^2]₀^(√(72-y))

= ∫₀³⁶ dy ∫₀²π dθ [(1/2)(72-y)]

= ∫₀³⁶ dy [π(72-y)]

= π[72y - (1/2)y^2] from 0 to 36

= π[2592]

Therefore, the volume of the given solid is 2592π.

Learn more about solid here:

https://brainly.com/question/17061172

#SPJ11

The area between z = 1.50 and z = 1.75 is larger than the area between z = 0.50 and z = 0.75 in the standard normal distribution.

The standard normal distribution is a bell-shaped curve that is symmetrical around the mean of zero and has a standard deviation of one. The area under the curve represents the probability of an event occurring within a certain range. In this case, we are comparing the area between z = 0.50 and z = 0.75 to the area between z = 1.50 and z = 1.75.

To find the area under the curve, we can use a standard normal distribution table or a calculator that has a built-in function to calculate this area. When we look at the z-scores, we can see that the second set of z-scores is further away from the mean than the first set. This means that the tails of the curve are longer, which results in a larger area under the curve. Therefore, the answer to the question is B. The area between z = 1.50 and z = 1.75 is larger than the area between z = 0.50 and z = 0.75 in the standard normal distribution.
Visit here to learn more about standard normal distribution:

brainly.com/question/29509087

#SPJ11

Answer:its the third one

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a. 120

Step-by-step explanation:

170 - 50 = 120

OR

The middle of 110 and 130 is 120

the middle of the box

X and Y are dependent.  [| = x] = P(Y <= x | X=x) = integral from -1 to x of (1/2)dy / (1/2)(1-x) = 2(x+1)/[(1-x)^2] for -1<= x <= 1.

(a) The marginal pdf of X is given by integrating the joint pdf over y from -infinity to infinity and is equal to (x) = integral from x to 1 of (1/2) dy = (1/2)(1-x), for -1<= x <= 1.

(b) The conditional pdf of Y given X=x is given by (y|x) = (x, y) / (x), for -1<= x <= 1 and x <= y <= 1. Substituting the value of the joint pdf and the marginal pdf of X, we get (y|x) = 2 for x <= y <= 1 and 0 otherwise.

(c) The conditional distribution of Y given X=x is given by the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of Y evaluated at y, divided by the marginal distribution of X evaluated at x. Therefore, [| = x] = P(Y <= x | X=x) = integral from -1 to x of (1/2)dy / (1/2)(1-x) = 2(x+1)/[(1-x)^2] for -1<= x <= 1.

(d) The unconditional distribution of Y is given by integrating the joint pdf over x and y, and is equal to [] = integral from -1 to 1 integral from x to 1 (1/2) dy dx = 1/3.

(e) X and Y are not independent since their joint pdf is not the product of their marginal pdfs. To see this, note that for -1<= x <= 0, (x) > 0 and (y) > 0, but (x, y) = 0. Therefore, X and Y are dependent.

Learn more about dependent here

https://brainly.com/question/30130695

#SPJ11

95% confident that the true population mean falls within the range of 16.46 to 19.54.

To calculate the 95% confidence intervals for the means of the two sample sets, we will use the formula:

Confidence interval = sample mean ± (t-value * standard error)

where the t-value is based on the degrees of freedom (n-1) and the desired confidence level, and the standard error is calculated as:

Standard error = sample standard deviation / sqrt(sample size)

For the 5 sample set with sample mean 12 and sample standard deviation 2.5, we have:

Standard error = 2.5 / sqrt(5) = 1.118

Using a t-value of 2.776 (based on 4 degrees of freedom and 95% confidence level), we get:

Confidence interval = 12 ± (2.776 * 1.118) = [8.06, 15.94]

This means that we are 95% confident that the true population mean falls within the range of 8.06 to 15.94.

For the 20 sample set with sample mean 18 and sample standard deviation 3.5, we have:

Standard error = 3.5 / sqrt(20) = 0.783

Using a t-value of 2.093 (based on 19 degrees of freedom and 95% confidence level), we get:

Confidence interval = 18 ± (2.093 * 0.783) = [16.46, 19.54]

This means that we are 95% confident that the true population mean falls within the range of 16.46 to 19.54.

The goodness of these estimations depends on various factors such as the sample size, the variability of the data, and the level of confidence desired. In general, larger sample sizes tend to produce more precise estimations with narrower confidence intervals, while higher levels of confidence require wider intervals. It is important to consider the context and purpose of the estimation when evaluating its goodness.

Learn more about population here

https://brainly.com/question/29885712

#SPJ11

Answer: To show that the curve passes through a point, we need to find a value of t that makes the parametric equations satisfy the coordinates of the point.

Let's first check if the curve passes through the point (1, 4, 0):

x = t^2, so when x = 1, we have t = ±1.

y = 1 - 3t, so when t = 1, we have y = -2.

z = 1 + t^3, so when t = 1, we have z = 2.

Therefore, the curve passes through the point (1, 4, 0).

Next, let's check if the curve passes through the point (9, -8, 28):

x = t^2, so when x = 9, we have t = ±3.

y = 1 - 3t, so when t = -3, we have y = 10.

z = 1 + t^3, so when t = 3, we have z = 28.

Therefore, the curve passes through the point (9, -8, 28).

Finally, let's check if the curve passes through the point (4, 7, -6):

x = t^2, so when x = 4, we have t = ±2.

y = 1 - 3t, so when t = 2, we have y = -5.

z = 1 + t^3, so when t = 2, we have z = 9.

Therefore, the curve does not pass through the point (4, 7, -6).

Hence, we have shown that the curve passes through the points (1, 4, 0) and (9, -8, 28) but not through the point (4, 7, -6).

We cannot find 3 divided by 0.12 because the denominator, 0.12, is a non-zero decimal number. However, if the question is about finding 3 divided by 12, then the answer would be 0.25.

This can be calculated by dividing the numerator (3) by the denominator (12). Thus, the quotient is 0.25.The original question mentioned "3 divided by 0.12."

If this was an error and the correct question is "3 divided by 12," then the answer is 0.25, as stated above. However, if the original question was indeed "3 divided by 0.12," then the answer is undefined since dividing by zero (0) is undefined in mathematics.

Know more about non-zero decimal number here:

https://brainly.com/question/18886013

#SPJ11

The given sequence is 64, 112, 196, 343. We will look for a pattern in the given sequence.

Step 1: The first term is 64.

Step 2: The second term is 112, which is the first term multiplied by 1.75 (112 = 64 x 1.75).

Step 3: The third term is 196, which is the second term multiplied by 1.75 (196 = 112 x 1.75).

Step 4: The fourth term is 343, which is the third term multiplied by 1.75 (343 = 196 x 1.75).

Step 5: Hence, we can see that each term in the sequence is the previous term multiplied by 1.75.So, the recursive formula that can be used to describe the given sequence is: a₁ = 64; aₙ = aₙ₋₁ x 1.75, n ≥ 2.

Know more about given sequence is 64, 112, 196, 343 here:

https://brainly.com/question/16894350

#SPJ11

The relation | on s = {1,2,3,4,6} is the set of ordered pairs {(1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (6,6)}. To find all linear extensions of | on s, we need to add any pairs that would make the relation linear.

For a relation to be linear, it must satisfy the transitive property. That is, if (a,b) and (b,c) are both in the relation, then (a,c) must also be in the relation.

In this case, we can add the pairs (1,2), (2,3), (3,4), and (4,6) to make the relation linear. So the set of ordered pairs for the linear extension of | on s is:

{(1,1), (1,2), (2,2), (2,3), (3,3), (3,4), (4,4), (4,6), (6,6)}
To know more about liner extension visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2248255

#SPJ11

In order to list the three teams in order of the fraction of games won from least to greatest, we need to convert the fractions into decimals and then compare all three decimals.

We are given the winds of three local baseball teams, and they all played the same number of games. The table shows the following details: Team Wins Fraction as percentage Decimal Equivalent Bears 57% 0.57Tigers 5/8 0.625Mustangs 0.65 0.65Now, we can compare the decimals to list the teams in order of the fraction of games won from least to greatest. Bears (0.57) < Tigers (0.625) < Mustangs (0.65) Hence, the three teams in order of the fraction of games won from least to greatest are Bears, Tigers, and Mustangs.

To know more about compare visit:

brainly.com/question/31877486

#SPJ11