What trade did the Lunda dominate?

Continued racial discrimination and segregation in various aspects of society, such as housing, public facilities, and education, demonstrated that the Brown v. Board of Education decision had not effectively ended racial discrimination.

While the Brown v. Board of Education decision in 1954 declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional, it did not bring an immediate end to racial discrimination. Numerous factors and subsequent events revealed that racial discrimination persisted in various forms, indicating that the impact of the Brown decision was limited.

One significant indicator was the persistence of racial segregation in schools. Despite the Court's ruling, many schools and districts resisted desegregation efforts, implementing tactics such as "token" integration, "separate but equal" policies, or outright defiance. The slow pace of desegregation efforts and the persistent existence of racially segregated schools illustrated that the Brown decision alone did not effectively eliminate racial discrimination in education.

Moreover, racial discrimination persisted in other areas beyond education. Housing discrimination, for example, prevented African Americans from accessing certain neighborhoods, perpetuating residential segregation and unequal opportunities. Discrimination in public facilities, such as restaurants, hotels, and transportation, also continued to limit equal access and treatment for people of color.

Additionally, discriminatory practices and attitudes persisted in employment, voting rights, and criminal justice , among other spheres. Racial disparities in income, employment opportunities, and criminal justice outcomes highlighted the ongoing presence of racial discrimination.

In summary, the existence of continued racial discrimination and segregation in housing, public facilities, education, employment, and other areas clearly demonstrated that the Brown v. Board of Education decision had not successfully ended racial discrimination. The decision marked an important milestone, but the struggle for racial equality and the dismantling of systemic discrimination required further efforts and legal developments beyond the initial ruling.

Learn more about justice here:

https://brainly.com/question/14830074

#SPJ11

The Alps served as a natural barrier that protected Rome from invasion. However, they also presented Hannibal with an opportunity to attempt a surprise attack by crossing the mountains.

The Alps acted as a protective barrier for Rome against invasions from the north. Their rugged terrain and harsh climate made it difficult for enemy forces to penetrate and advance towards Rome. This natural defense system provided a significant advantage to the Roman Empire, ensuring the security of their capital city.

On the other hand, the Alps presented Hannibal, the Carthaginian general, with a strategic opportunity during the Second Punic War. In 218 BCE, Hannibal decided to march his army across the Alps to launch a surprise attack on Rome. While this route was treacherous and challenging, it allowed Hannibal to bypass the Roman defenses along the coast and catch the Romans off-guard. Hannibal's army successfully crossed the mountains, although they suffered significant losses due to the harsh conditions.

Learn more about invasions here:

https://brainly.com/question/909866

#SPJ11

These powers is considered an implied power is: OC. creating a national bank.

Although the Constitution didn't specifically mention it the establishment of a national bank was regarded as a necessary and suitable step for exercising several listed authorities such as the authority to mint money and regulate trade.

The establishment of a national bank based on implied powers was upheld as constitutional in the 1819 Supreme Court decision of McCulloch v. Maryland.

Therefore the correct option is C.

Learn more about implied power here:https://brainly.com/question/1569756
#SPJ1

To simplify the expression (csc(-x) / sec(-x)) + (cos(-x) / sin(-x)), you can use trigonometric identities to rewrite the terms. By applying the reciprocal identities, you can transform the expression into a single term and simplify further.

Start by applying the reciprocal identities to the individual terms. The reciprocal of csc(-x) is sin(-x), and the reciprocal of sec(-x) is cos(-x). Similarly, the reciprocal of cos(-x) is sec(-x), and the reciprocal of sin(-x) is csc(-x).

Using these identities, the expression can be rewritten as (sin(-x) / cos(-x)) + (sec(-x) / csc(-x)). Now, you need to simplify this expression further.

To combine the terms, you can find the least common denominator (LCD) between cos(-x) and csc(-x). The LCD is 1 / sin(-x), so multiply the first term by (1 / sin(-x)) and the second term by (sin(-x) / sin(-x)).

After simplifying, you will have (sin(-x) / cos(-x)) + (sec(-x) * sin(-x) / csc(-x) * sin(-x)). Simplify the second term by using the identity sec(-x) * sin(-x) = 1 / cos(-x), and csc(-x) * sin(-x) = 1 / cos(-x).

The expression now becomes (sin(-x) / cos(-x)) + (1 / cos(-x)). Combining the terms, you get (sin(-x) + 1) / cos(-x).

In summary, by applying the reciprocal identities and simplifying the expression step by step, you can rewrite (csc(-x) / sec(-x)) + (cos(-x) / sin(-x)) as (sin(-x) + 1) / cos(-x).

Learn more about least common denominator

https://brainly.com/question/30797045

#SPJ11

The events that led to V-E Day and V-J Day, marking the end of World War II, were a culmination of significant military campaigns and strategic victories by the Allied forces.

V-E Day, or Victory in Europe Day, was celebrated on May 8, 1945, following the unconditional surrender of Nazi Germany. This surrender came after a series of Allied offensives, including the D-Day invasion of Normandy, the Battle of Stalingrad, and the steady advance of Allied forces through Europe. These campaigns weakened and eventually defeated Germany's military and political power, leading to the end of the war in Europe.

V-J Day, or Victory over Japan Day, occurred on August 15, 1945, after Japan's surrender to the Allied forces. The events that led to V-J Day included the dropping of atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in early August 1945, which devastated Japan's industrial and military capacity. Combined with the Soviet Union's declaration of war on Japan, these events forced Japan's surrender and brought an end to the war in the Pacific.

In summary, V-E Day was achieved through a series of successful military campaigns and the ultimate surrender of Nazi Germany, while V-J Day resulted from the atomic bombings and Japan's subsequent surrender. These milestones marked the end of World War II, bringing about a significant turning point in global history.

To learn more about V-E Day and V-J Day click here; brainly.com/question/30612577

#SPJ11

Option B. Understanding ancient languages was the usefulness of Rosetta Stone.

The Rosetta Stone was an ancient Egyptian artifact discovered in 1799. It is a granodiorite stele inscribed with a decree issued at Memphis in 196 BC by King Ptolemy V. The decree was written in three scripts: Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs, Egyptian demotic script, and Ancient Greek.

The importance of the Rosetta Stone lies in the idea that it gave the key to deciphering hieroglyphic writing, which had been undecipherable until then.

learn more about Rosetta Stone: https://brainly.com/question/14534343

#SPJ1

The tomb of Pu-abi, a Sumerian queen, exemplifies the elaborate and sophisticated burial practices of ancient civilizations.

The tomb contained numerous precious objects such as jewelry, musical instruments, and ceremonial objects, all of which were buried with the deceased. This suggests a belief in an afterlife and the importance of preparing for it with luxurious items.

The tomb also demonstrates the existence of a social hierarchy, as only the wealthiest members of society were able to afford such elaborate burial practices. Overall, the tomb of Pu-abi exemplifies the cultural and religious beliefs of ancient civilizations and their commitment to honoring and preserving the memory of their deceased leaders.

To know more about Pu-abi visit

https://brainly.com/question/32316690

#SPJ11

Ileana had the money invested for approximately 3.08 years.

to find out how long ileana had the money invested, we can use the formula for simple interest:

interest = principal * rate * time

given:

interest = $5,084

rate = 4.1% (or 0.041 as a decimal)

principal = $15,500

we need to solve for time.

interest = principal * rate * time

$5,084 = $15,500 * 0.041 * time

dividing both sides of the equation by ($15,500 * 0.041):

time = $5,084 / ($15,500 * 0.041)

time ≈ 3.08 years

Learn more about interest here:

https://brainly.com/question/30393144

#SPJ11

The Border States remain loyal to the Union during the Civil War option  D. These slave states relied more heavily on northern trade.

The population and army of the South would have been significantly enhanced if the border states had joined the Confederacy. Nonetheless, in the event that the US was more merciful on the boundary states and permitted bondage there somewhat, the Line states would give a 'support' zone to assist . The correct option is D.

The boundary states in the midst of the Nationwide conflict were the slave communicates that didn't leave the Association. These states included Delaware, Kentucky, Maryland, and Missouri. Additionally, West Virginia, which split off from Virginia during the war, was regarded as a border state.

To learn more about border states

https://brainly.com/question/1194056

#SPJ1

Answer:

because although the people that live inside of islam are considered to be apart of the reason why 9/11 happened its not accurate because they weren't the terrorist who helped carry out the attack

The statement that Winston and Julia cannot get married because they are committing adultery and would go to prison or be executed is false.

Explanation: The given statement is referring to the characters Winston and Julia from George Orwell's novel "1984." In the novel, the government exercises strict control over personal relationships and prohibits certain forms of personal freedom, including engaging in romantic relationships outside the boundaries set by the state. While their actions are considered illegal within the dystopian society depicted in the book, it does not necessarily mean that marriage is completely prohibited or impossible for them. The consequences of their actions, such as imprisonment or execution, are specific to the fictional world of "1984" and the oppressive regime depicted in the story.

In the real world, the legality and consequences of adultery vary depending on the laws and cultural norms of different societies. In many jurisdictions, adultery may not be a criminal offense, but it can have social and personal repercussions. Marriage, on the other hand, is a legal and social institution regulated by laws and customs that vary across different countries and cultures. While committing adultery may have consequences within a marriage, such as divorce or strained relationships, the ability to get married itself is typically determined by legal requirements and individual choices.

Therefore, the statement that Winston and Julia cannot get married solely because they are committing adultery and would face imprisonment or execution is false in the context of the novel and does not reflect the complexities of real-world marriage laws and societal norms.

To learn more about adultery Click Here: brainly.com/question/11667754

#SPJ11

The period in American history most associated with the idea that positions in the federal bureaucracy should be reserved for prominent gentlemen is the Era of Good Feelings.

The Era of Good Feelings refers to a period in the United States from approximately 1815 to 1825, following the War of 1812. During this time, there was a prevailing sense of political unity and reduced partisan conflict, largely attributed to the dominance of the Democratic-Republican Party.

In this era, there was a general belief that government positions should be reserved for individuals of high social status, often referred to as "prominent gentlemen." This idea stemmed from the belief that educated, elite men were better equipped to govern and make decisions in the interest of the nation. It reflected a more aristocratic view of governance and political appointments, prioritizing social standing and connections over merit or expertise.

This perspective gradually shifted as the United States expanded and democratized, leading to broader participation in government and reforms in the civil service system. The concept of open competition and merit-based appointments gained prominence in later periods.

To learn more about American history, visit

brainly.com/question/21425542

#SPJ11

Answer:

a bud

Explanation:

The typical characteristics of slave religion in the first half of the nineteenth century included a combination of African traditions and Christian beliefs.

Enslaved individuals often incorporated aspects of their African religious practices into their Christian worship. It was not typically centered on enslaved chaplains who were mouthpieces for the owner's religious understanding. This syncretism allowed enslaved people to maintain a connection to their African heritage while also adapting to the religious practices of their enslavers.

The development of slave religion was often influenced by the social and cultural context of the plantation. Enslaved people sometimes used Christian rhetoric to critique the institution of slavery and express their desire for freedom, while at other times, slave owners used religion to control and subjugate their slaves

Overall, slave religion was a complex and dynamic phenomenon that reflected the unique experiences and cultural heritage of enslaved people. It incorporated elements of both African traditions and Christian beliefs, and its development was shaped by the social and cultural context of the plantation.

To know more about Religion refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/14043019

#SPJ11

The major component of the 1996 welfare reform act was to encourage work and self-sufficiency among welfare recipients.

The 1996 welfare reform act, officially known as the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA), marked a significant shift in welfare policy in the United States. One of its central objectives was to shift the focus from providing cash assistance to promoting work and self-sufficiency. The act introduced Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), which placed a greater emphasis on work requirements, time limits, and financial incentives to encourage welfare recipients to seek employment.

Under the reform, states were granted more flexibility in designing and implementing their welfare programs, allowing them to tailor assistance to the specific needs of their populations. The act also included provisions for job training, education, and support services to help individuals transition from welfare to work.

The intent behind this approach was to break the cycle of dependency and promote economic independence among welfare recipients. By encouraging work and self-sufficiency, policymakers aimed to reduce long-term welfare reliance, increase labor force participation, and improve overall economic outcomes for individuals and families.

Learn more about welfare reform here: brainly.com/question/30453686
#SPJ11

The big man of New Guinea is characterized by the following aspect is a highly influential figure in a community

The big man is a prominent figure in the social and political structure of certain indigenous communities in New Guinea. They are typically individuals who have acquired wealth, either through successful economic ventures or by accumulating resources through networks of reciprocity.

The big man's influence extends beyond their economic standing, as they play significant roles in decision-making processes, conflict resolution, and mediation within their communities. Their ability to mobilize followers and garner support is crucial for their leadership position.

While there may be variations in the specific attributes and functions of big men across different communities, the overall characteristics mentioned earlier are typically associated with this role.

Learn more about new guinea here: brainly.com/question/31134918
#SPJ11

The government agency that establishes zoning codes

for building construction in a town or city is option A. Local government

Among the services provided, there are commonly recognized ones like education, social welfare, housing and urban development, and garbage disposal, as well as less known ones such as approval, commercial guidance, registry assistance, and vermin removal.

Local governments, such as city councils or municipal governments, have the authority to create and enforce these zoning codes based on the specific needs and priorities of their community

Learn more about government agency from

https://brainly.com/question/28149044

#SPJ1

One specific form of variety show that started in the late 1800's and still influences theatrical and film comedy today is known as Vaudeville.

Vaudeville was a form of entertainment that originated in France and became popular in the United States during the late 1800s. It was a variety show that featured a mixture of different acts such as comedy skits, music performances, dancing, and acrobatics.

Vaudeville shows were typically family-friendly and were designed to appeal to a wide audience. They often included slapstick comedy and other forms of physical comedy, as well as performances by famous vaudeville stars such as Harry Houdini and the Marx Brothers.

Vaudeville had a significant impact on the development of modern comedy. Many of the comedic techniques used in vaudeville, such as physical comedy and wordplay, continue to be used in contemporary comedy today. In addition, vaudeville helped to launch the careers of many famous comedians, including Charlie Chaplin and Buster Keaton.

Overall, vaudeville was an important form of entertainment that had a lasting impact on theatrical and film comedy. Its legacy can still be seen today in the many forms of comedy that continue to make us laugh.

To know more about vaudeville, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/14534887#

#SPJ11

Religion has played a larger role in conflicts since the late 20th century due to a combination of factors, including increased religious identity and political mobilization, globalization, and the resurgence of religious fundamentalism.

The late 20th century witnessed a notable increase in the role of religion in conflicts around the world. Several factors contributed to this phenomenon. Firstly, there was a resurgence of religious identity and political mobilization, particularly in regions where religious affiliations were deeply intertwined with ethnic, cultural, and national identities. This led to religious groups becoming more politically active and seeking to assert their influence or gain power, often resulting in conflicts with other religious or ethnic groups.

Secondly, globalization played a role in amplifying religious conflicts. As the world became more interconnected, cultural and religious differences were brought to the forefront, leading to clashes between different religious communities. Globalization also facilitated the spread of extremist ideologies and religious fundamentalism, which often fuel conflicts based on religious differences.

Moreover, the decline of Cold War geopolitics and the subsequent power vacuum in various regions created an environment where religious tensions and aspirations for self-determination could emerge as primary drivers of conflicts. Religious leaders and organizations also gained prominence as influential actors in political landscapes.

To learn more about globalization click here brainly.com/question/12646918

#SPJ11

Graduated escalation was a military strategy used by the United States during the Vietnam War. It was promoted by President Lyndon B. Johnson as a way to gradually increase the U.S. military presence in Vietnam.

Graduated escalation was a military strategy used by the United States during the Vietnam War. It was promoted by President Lyndon B. Johnson as a way to gradually increase the U.S. military presence in Vietnam, with the hope of forcing the North Vietnamese to come to the bargaining table and end the conflict. The idea was to slowly increase the intensity of the U.S. military campaign in Vietnam, with the hope that the North Vietnamese would eventually give up.

However, this strategy ultimately failed, as the North Vietnamese were able to withstand the increasing U.S. military pressure. Despite the massive U.S. military buildup in Vietnam, the North Vietnamese refused to come to the bargaining table until the U.S. agreed to a complete withdrawal of its forces from Vietnam. This ultimately led to a long and costly conflict that lasted for years.

To know more about Vietnam War visit

https://brainly.com/question/31621448

#SPJ11

The ACLU's statement can be seen as a reaction against violations of civil liberties before and during World War 1 in several ways.

Firstly, the statement explicitly calls out the government's use of the Espionage Act and Sedition Act to suppress free speech and dissent. These acts were used to prosecute individuals who spoke out against the war, leading to the arrest and imprisonment of thousands of Americans. The ACLU saw this as a clear violation of the First Amendment and worked to defend the rights of those individuals.

Additionally, the statement addresses the targeting of immigrant communities and the violation of their rights. During World War 1, there was a strong anti-immigrant sentiment in the country, with many immigrants being viewed as a threat to national security. The ACLU fought against the discrimination and mistreatment of immigrant communities, including those who were wrongly targeted and accused of being spies or sympathizers of enemy nations.

Overall, the ACLU's statement can be seen as a strong stance against government overreach and a defense of individual rights and liberties during a time of national crisis.

For more about violations:

https://brainly.com/question/31558707

#SPJ11

The Iron Curtain meant the metaphorical boundary that separated Western Europe and the Eastern Bloc during the Cold War.

The Iron Curtain represented the political and ideological division between Western Europe and the Eastern Bloc nations during the Cold War. It was a term coined by British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in 1946 to describe the isolation and separation created by the Soviet Union's control over Eastern European countries.

The Iron Curtain symbolized the physical and ideological barrier that prevented free movement, communication and interaction between the Eastern and Western parts of Europe. It represented the stark contrast between the democratic and capitalist societies of Western Europe and the communist regimes of the Eastern Bloc.

Read more about iron curtain

brainly.com/question/24125945

#SPJ1

The Iron Curtain was a term used to describe the ideological and physical division of Europe during the Cold War, particularly from the end of World War II in 1945 until the late 1980s.

The term "Iron Curtain" was popularized by British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in a speech to describe the division between the communist countries of Eastern Europe, which were under the influence of the Soviet Union, and the non-communist countries of Western Europe.

The fall of the Iron Curtain began in 1989 with the peaceful revolutions in Eastern Europe, which saw the collapse of communist regimes and the opening of borders.

learn more about Winston Churchill: https://brainly.com/question/25495942

#SPJ1

The outcome of allowing peasants to own land and keep the profits would depend on the specific context and policies surrounding the implementation of such a change.

In general, allowing peasants to own land and keep the profits could have positive effects on their economic and social well-being. It could give them a sense of ownership and control over their own lives and livelihoods, leading to greater investment in their land and more efficient use of resources.

This could result in increased agricultural productivity and higher yields, leading to greater food security and improved living standards for the peasants and their families.

However, there may also be challenges and potential negative consequences associated with such a change. For example, if the distribution of land ownership is unequal, some peasants may benefit more than others, potentially exacerbating existing social and economic inequalities.

Additionally, if the legal and institutional frameworks for land ownership and tenure are weak or nonexistent, peasants may face challenges in asserting their ownership rights and defending their land from encroachment by more powerful actors.

The impact of allowing peasants to own land and keep the profits would depend on a variety of factors, including the specific policies and institutions in place.

For more questions on peasants, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/4066509

#SPJ11

this feels like a short essay question maybe even short answer but you can simplify if you want

The decolonization period in the 20th century saw many African and Asian nations gain independence from their colonial rulers. Two such countries were India, which gained independence from British rule in 1947, and Kenya, also a British colony, which became independent in 1963.

One clear similarity between the two countries' path to independence was the utilization of non-violent resistance as a strategic tool. In India, this was exemplified by Mahatma Gandhi's philosophy of non-violent civil disobedience, which included strikes, protests, and boycotts of British goods and institutions. Similarly, in Kenya, there were numerous peaceful protests and strikes, particularly during the 1950s, advocating for Kenyan independence.

While both nations used non-violent methods as part of their freedom struggles, the nature and extent of violence and conflict in their paths to independence represented a significant difference. India, although it experienced periods of communal violence, largely pursued a peaceful transition of power. The Quit India Movement of 1942, although suppressed violently by the British, was fundamentally a non-violent campaign.

In contrast, Kenya's journey was marked by a significant violent uprising known as the Mau Mau Rebellion (1952-1960). The rebellion was primarily led by the Kikuyu people against British colonial rule, which was responded to with brutal force by the colonial authorities, leading to substantial loss of life. This violent struggle had a significant impact on Britain's decision to decolonize Kenya.

In conclusion, while both India and Kenya strategically used non-violent resistance in their fight against British colonial rule, the level and nature of conflict significantly differed. India's path to independence was predominantly non-violent, while Kenya's journey involved a major violent rebellion. Despite these different paths, both nations eventually succeeded in gaining their freedom, leaving a lasting impact on their national histories and identities.

During the civil rights movement in the United States, activists employed various strategies to persuade Americans to support civil rights and abolish Jim Crow laws. These strategies included peaceful protests, legal challenges, grassroots organizing, media campaigns, and public speeches.

The arguments used by civil rights activists were compelling and played a crucial role in changing public opinion and mobilizing support for the cause. Here are some key aspects of their arguments:

1. Appeal to the American Values: Civil rights activists emphasized the principles of equality, justice, and freedom upon which the nation was founded. They argued that Jim Crow laws contradicted these ideals and perpetuated discrimination based on race, which was inherently unjust and against the spirit of American democracy.

2. Moral and Human Rights Perspective: Activists framed their struggle as a moral issue and highlighted the violation of basic human rights faced by African Americans under Jim Crow laws. They stressed the importance of treating all individuals with dignity and respect, irrespective of their race, and challenged the conscience of Americans to stand against racial discrimination.

3. Economic and Societal Benefits: Civil rights activists pointed out the economic and societal disadvantages that segregation and discrimination imposed on African Americans and the broader society. They argued that equality and equal opportunities for all citizens would benefit the economy, promote social harmony, and lead to a more prosperous nation.

4. Nonviolent Resistance: By adopting nonviolent tactics such as sit-ins, freedom rides, and peaceful protests, civil rights activists aimed to contrast their moral stance with the violence and hostility often faced by African Americans. They sought to gain sympathy and support by demonstrating their commitment to nonviolent change and showing the stark contrast between their peaceful actions and the violent responses from segregationists.

5. Legal and Constitutional Arguments: Activists utilized legal strategies to challenge Jim Crow laws in the courts, arguing that they violated the principles of the Constitution, specifically the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of equal protection under the law. By highlighting the legal inconsistencies and constitutional infringements of Jim Crow, civil rights activists aimed to sway public opinion in favor of equality and justice.

The arguments put forth by civil rights activists were highly convincing for several reasons. Firstly, they appealed to deeply held American values of equality and justice, resonating with the core principles of the nation. By framing the struggle as a moral and human rights issue, activists tapped into the collective conscience of Americans, compelling them to confront the injustice of racial discrimination. Additionally, by emphasizing the economic and societal benefits of equality, activists made a practical case for ending Jim Crow laws, appealing to a broader audience concerned with the nation's progress and prosperity.

Furthermore, the nonviolent nature of the civil rights movement and the stark contrast between peaceful protesters and violent opposition helped to gain sympathy and support from the public. The strategic use of media coverage and the power of visual imagery brought the realities of segregation and racial discrimination to the forefront, fostering empathy and understanding among viewers.

Moreover, the legal arguments made by civil rights activists were grounded in the principles of the Constitution, resonating with the American reverence for the rule of law. This legal framework provided a solid foundation for challenging the legality of Jim Crow laws and contributed to the convincing nature of the arguments.

In combination, these factors contributed to the effectiveness of the civil rights activists' arguments and played a significant role in swaying public opinion, eventually leading to the dismantling of Jim Crow laws and the advancement of civil rights in the United States.

Learn more about civil rights here:

https://brainly.com/question/2375577

#SPJ11

Christa McAuliffe was an inspirational figure for her dedication to education, bravery, and perseverance.

Learn more about brainstorming here:

https://brainly.com/question/30104784

#SPJ11

The differences in women's dresses in England and France around 1800 were not directly influenced by any of the options provided (A, B, C, or D). Therefore, the correct answer is E, none of the above.

The differences in women's dresses in England and France around 1800 can be attributed to various factors, but none of the options mentioned in the given choices directly explain the phenomenon.

During this period, there was a significant exchange of cultural influences between England and France. While French fashion did have an impact on English styles, it was not solely due to the development of Anglomania among French women (Option A). Similarly, English women's rejection of French styles due to their dislike of Napoleon (Option B) or the ongoing war between England and France (Option C) cannot fully explain the evolution of dress styles.

Furthermore, the French support for the United States during its revolution against England (Option D) did not directly contribute to the differences in women's dresses in England and France.

To learn more about napoleon click here: brainly.com/question/31893529

#SPJ11

President Franklin D. Roosevelt made the above statement following the attack on Pearl Harbor by the Japanese. The context of the statement was the immediate aftermath of the surprise attack on December 7, 1941, which propelled the United States into World War II.

The statement, "As Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy I have directed that all measures be taken for our defense, that always will our whole nation remember the character of the onslaught against us..." was made by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1941.

The context of this statement was the attack on Pearl Harbor, which occurred on December 7, 1941. The surprise attack by the Japanese on the US naval base in Hawaii resulted in significant loss of life and caused extensive damage to the American fleet.

In his address to the nation, President Roosevelt assumed his role as Commander-in-Chief and expressed his directive for all necessary measures to be taken for defense. He emphasized the gravity of the situation, urging the American people to remember the nature of the onslaught they had endured.

The attack on Pearl Harbor united the American people and galvanized their support for the war effort. It led to the declaration of war against Japan and ultimately resulted in the United States joining the Allied forces in the global conflict against the Axis powers. Roosevelt's statement reflected the resolve of the nation to fight back and secure victory in the face of this unprovoked attack.

Learn more about invasion here : brainly.com/question/11770601

#SPJ11

The Missouri Compromise, the Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act were all attempts to solve the problem of the extension of slavery into the western territories. Option B

The Missouri Compromise, the Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act were all ways implement to deal with the conflict of whether slavery would be allowed in new places and states as the United States expanded westward.

The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 fought back the Missouri Compromise and allowed the people of each teritory to decide for themselvs whether or not to allow slavery.

Find more exercises on Missouri Compromise;

https://brainly.com/question/14020956

#SPJ1

The Battle on the Ugra River is noteworthy due to the conflict between powerful rulers and its role in the decline of the Golden Horde. Here options C and D are the correct answer.

The Battle on the Ugra River (1480) between Ivan III of the Grand Duchy of Moscow and Akhmat Khan of the Golden Horde is noteworthy because of the conflict between two powerful rulers and its impact on the decline of the Golden Horde.

C) The battle marked a significant conflict between Ivan III, the ruler of Moscow, and Akhmat Khan, the leader of the Golden Horde. It represented the struggle for power and control between these two influential figures during the late medieval period.

D) The battle had a profound impact on the decline of the Golden Horde. Although the battle ended inconclusively with no clear victor, it marked a turning point in the history of the Golden Horde. It weakened the Horde's hold over the Russian lands and contributed to its ultimate fragmentation and decline.

To learn more about the medieval period

https://brainly.com/question/31464192

#SPJ4

Complete question:

Which of the following makes the Battle on the Ugra River (1480) between Ivan III of the Grand Duchy of Moscow and Akhmat Khan of the Golden Horde noteworthy?

A) The decisive victory achieved by Ivan III

B) The strategic location of the Ugra River

C) The conflict between two powerful rulers

D) The impact on the decline of the Golden Horde