In the biblical story of David and Goliath, a young boy takes down a giant using only a slingshot. Alluding to this story when describing a battle most likely implies that
PLS ANSWER I NEED IT NOWWWWWWW

Answer:

A technological device that transmits fraudulent credentials to trick cell phones into connecting to it.

Explanation:

The Stingray is "cell site simulator". It was initially developed for the military and intelligence community. It is invasive cell phone surveillance device. It is a technological device that actually transmits fraudulent credentials to trick cell phones into connecting to it. It does that by mimicking cell phone towers and eventually tricks cell phones in that area to send out their locations and information.

Answer:

"Romeos monologue is a poem of him talking for one. Secondly I’m pretty sure he’s talking about Juliet and how pretty she is but how there is much distance between them and it’s hard to see her but she is constantly on her mind."

Explanation:

Credit to guy next to me.

Answer:Include a relevant quotation from the novel

Explanation:Since she is making a literary critique about the novel it will be wise to use actual quotations from the novel so that one can actual see the flow of her critiques and how valid they are when you look at what she would have quoted.

The critique is about the novel so to make a sound argument she must quote from that novel.

Answer:C

Explanation:edge2021

Answer:

It shows that the haystack provides safety from the storm

Explanation:

According to the excerpt, Aaron is trapped in a storm and somehow he manages to save himself and the goat as he made use of hay to keep himself and the goat warm.

The excerpt develops the setting of the story by showing that the haystack provides safety from the storm.

Answer:

Use the drop-down menus to answer the questions.

What can you conclude about the work of engineers based on today's reading?

✔ Engineers have to be able to see failure as an opportunity for improvement.

Which is an important character trait for an engineer or inventor?

✔ being persistent

Explanation:

Answer:

I've done it

Explanation:

Answer: B. Stratosphere

Explanation:

Most ozone (about 90%) is found in the stratosphere, which begins about 10–16 kilometers (6–10 miles) above Earth's surface and extends up to about 50 kilo- meters (31 miles) altitude.

The stratosphere is the level of the atmosphere are they concerned. Thus, option (b) is correct.

What is atmosphere?

The term “atmosphere” refers to the layers of gases surrounding a planet. The gases are the division of the Earth, such as the highest percentage is 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, and only 1% of the other gases. The climate is the change to impact of the atmosphere.

The stratosphere, mesosphere, troposphere, and thermosphere are all different sorts of strata in the atmosphere. The stratosphere is the second layer of the Earth's atmosphere. According to the expert, the study has grown to 50 kilometers (31 miles) in height. The ozone layer is the solar ultraviolet radiation in this layer.

As a result, the atmosphere are they concerned about stratosphere. Therefore, option (b) is correct.

Learn more about atmosphere, here:

https://brainly.com/question/26767532

#SPJ2

Answer:

I think it Distract the Public I'm not sure

Explanation:

Fight the Nazis is wrong

cheer people up you chose which of this are good

Distract the public maybe you chose which of this are good

Sell exercise products is wrong

Answer:

War and peace

Explanation:

Answer:

2.

Explanation:

Dog and Cat

Answer:

it doesn't because if either way the if it is the same story then the plot will always stay tthe same

Explanation:

Answer:

The choice of narrator, especially a first-person narrator, affects the plot because a first-person narrator's knowledge is limited to what that person is present to see and hear. We can't know what anyone else is thinking and much action is left out because the narrator may not have seen or heard it. That information must be conveyed through dialogue with other characters. In this excerpt, using a different point of view or choosing a different first-person narrator would change the information we receive. For example, Sam or Patrick would probably not feel like being in their own house was like being "someplace better," and the impression we are given of the parents would also be affected.

Explanation:

Just took the test.

Answer:

Victor finally breaks his secrecy and tries to convince a magistrate in Geneva that an unnatural monster is responsible for the death of Elizabeth, but the magistrate does not believe him. Victor resolves to devote the rest of his life to finding and destroying the monster.

Explanation:

this is about "frankenstien" by mary shelley right?

i read the book like a year ago, so i'm not positive but i believe thats it

Answer:

Logos

Explanation:

Logos is the most effective appeal because using human rights and the constitution for support gives off a higher stature from women. Logos is an appeal that shows no emotion while ethos and pathos do and if women show too much emotion, they would be given the benefit of the doubt, which is not what Anthony is striving for.

She means that she is without a backbone, the ability to give way in the face of hardships or aggression from others.

Answer: For future reference please explain more in depth or in detail of what you need help with!

Explanation:

If you need additional help with something please don't hesitate to private message me or comment here! Have a nice day/night! :))

Answer:

i'm so sorry, include info on your lesson.

Explanation:

Answer:

Stanley wished that everything that happened in his life was different. This compares with the words "if only, if only", because it reflects Stanley's thinking thinking "If only things were different."

Explanation:

Stanley has a curse that damages his life and makes him go through very bad situations in his life. He would very much like his life to have been different, that the experiences he had had been different. For this reason, Stanley can live in a constant feeling of projection where he thinks "if only my life were different, if only things had happened differently." This relates entirely to the song sung by Sarah, especially the words "if only, if only".

Answer:

Stanley wished that everything that happened in his life was different. This compares with the words "if only, if only", because it reflects Stanley's thinking thinking "If only things were different."

Explanation:

Answer:

Poe's overall tone in The Cask of Amontillado is unsettling and ominous. He uses irony and chilling humor to create a feeling of uneasiness in the audience.

Explanation:

Answer:

Poe's overall tone in The Cask of Amontillado is unsettling and ominous. He uses irony and chilling humor to create a feeling of uneasiness in the audience.

Explanation:

Answer:its 2

Explanation:

Using the context clues, the meaning of the underlined word is shrill.

This refers to the use of hints to show that an action is about to take place which can be used in foreshadowing.

With this in mind, we can see that from the given sentence, there is the narration about how the trumpet made an unpleasant sound which was jarring and this shows that the sound was shrill.

Read more about context clues here:

https://brainly.com/question/8712844

Answer:

2. We lived in a cozy little brick house surrounded by the smell of pig farms.

Explanation:

Sensory details refer to the details that employ or involve the five senses- the sense of smell, taste, touch, sight, and sound in giving the descriptive detail of something. So, any settings or detail given that involves these five sources are called to be sensory details.

The sentence that uses one of these sensory details to create a setting is the second sentence. In the second sentence, the setting is created with the help of the sense of smell, when the speaker mentioned "cozy little brick house surrounded by the smell of pig farms".

Thus, the correct answer is option 2.

Answer:Angelina Jolie is much like the greek god Aphrodite in a way because of her angelic appearance and romantic personality. she has a messy and complicated love life but still manages to keep her heart first!

If this helped leave a brainliest or a thanks!

Have an amazing day/night!

Answer:

The Duke is accusing the Duchess of flirtatious, disgraceful behavior. These actions were considered indecent by her husband, who'd given her a title (nine-hundred year old name).

Answer:

Robert Browning – My Last Duchess

Explanation:

Is this what you were looking for? The name of the poem? If not I would love to help you. Just, in the comments.

Answer: go to https://brainly.com/app/contact to contact customer support so they change your name

Explanation:

Answer:

By Mohsin Hamid Ask novelists whether they spend more time watching TV or reading fiction and prepare yourself to hear them say the unsayable. Movies have always seemed to me a much tighter form of storytelling than novels, requiring greater compression, and in that sense falling somewhere between the short story and the novel in scale. To watch a feature film is to be immersed in its world for an hour and a half, or maybe two, or exceptionally three. A novel that takes only three hours to read would be a short novel indeed, and novels that last five times as long are commonplace. Television is more capacious. Episode after episode, and season after season, a serial drama can uncoil for dozens of hours before reaching its end. Along the way, its characters and plot have room to develop, to change course, to congeal. In its near limitlessness, TV rivals the novel. What once sheltered the novel were differences in the quality of writing. Films could be well written, but they were smaller than novels. TV was big, but its writing was clunky. The novel had “Pride and Prejudice”; TV had “Dynasty.” But television has made enormous leaps in the last decade or so. The writing has improved remarkably, as have the acting, direction and design. Recently we’ve been treated to many shows that seem better than any that came before: the brilliant ethnography of “The Wire,” the dazzling sci-fi of “Battlestar Galactica,” the gorgeous period re-creation of “Mad Men,” the gripping fantasy of “Game of Thrones,” the lacerating self-exploration of “Girls.” Nor is TV’s rise confined to shows originating in only one country. Pakistani, Indian, British and dubbed Turkish dramas are all being devoured here in Pakistan. Thanks to downloads, even Denmark’s “Borgen” has found its local niche. I now watch a lot of TV. And I’m not alone, even among my colleagues. Ask novelists today whether they spend more time watching TV or reading fiction and prepare yourself, at least occasionally, to hear them say the unsayable. That this represents a crisis for the novel seems to me undeniable. But a crisis can be an opportunity. It incites change. And the novel needs to keep changing if it is to remain novel. It must, pilfering a phrase from TV, boldly go where no one has gone before. In the words of the Canadian writer Sheila Heti: “Now that there are these impeccable serial dramas, writers of fiction should feel let off the hook more — not feel obliged to worry so much about plot or character, since audiences can get their fill of plot and character and story there, so novelists can take off in other directions, like what happened with painting when photography came into being more than a hundred years ago. After that there was an incredible flourishing of the art, in so many fascinating directions. The novel should only do what the serial drama could never do.” Television is not the new novel. Television is the old novel. In the future, novelists need not abandon plot and character, but would do well to bear in mind the novel’s weirdness…. Novels are characterized by their intimacy, which is extreme, by their scale, which is vast, and by their form, which is linguistic and synesthetic…. Television gives us something that looks like a small world, made by a group of people who are themselves a small world. The novel gives us sounds pinned down by hieroglyphs, refracted flickerings inside an individual. Sufis tell of two paths to transcendence: One is to look out at the universe and see yourself, the other is to look within yourself and see the universe. Their destinations may converge, but television and the novel travel in opposite directions.

What advantages does Hamid say contemporary television has over the novel? In what ways does Hamid lend credibility to his argument? In an essay of 300 words or more, and using evidence from the text, analyze this argument about the advantages of television, identifying three persuasive examples Hamid uses to bolster his argument.

Explanation:

Hamid shows that today's televisions work better and have more elaborate and complex plots and this attracts the public's attention more intensely.

Hamid talks about this in the article "Are the New ‘Golden Age’ TV Shows the New Novels?" where he shows that in the past people read more than listen to television, but nowadays these roles have been reversed and television has attracted more and more viewers, while books have lost readers.

Hamid says that this has happened because:

With this, we can conclude that televisions have attracted a larger audience because they have invested in quality both in their operation and in their productions.

You can find more information about this at the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/20393662?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

In the sixteenth century, an age of great marine and terrestrial exploration, Ferdinand Magellan led the first expedition to sail around the world.

None of the above

Answer:

One should first ask what is the intent of the argument whether it is about facts, something meaningful or if it is useful.

Explanation:

When arguing with someone, it is important to understand the purpose of the argument. One should first ask what is the intent of the argument whether it is about facts, something meaningful or if it is useful. This can be done by summarizing a position back to the person you are arguing with. It will help you understand where the nuances occur between you and the other person.

Taking this step might help one to understand someone else's logic because it helps you understand the intent of the other person's argument. Through this, one get to understand if the other person is arguing for facts' sake, personal opinion or something useful to them.