Answer:
asset Forfeiture is the answer
Explanation:
When President Obama assists fellow Democrats in their election campaigns by endorsing them and making speeches on their behalf he plays the role of
Chief Executor
Chief of Party
Chief Legislator
Chief of State
Answer:
I believe it is the Chief of Party.
Explanation:
Don Long is convicted of second-degree murder for killing a woman he had been seeing over the last few months. The court sentenced
him to 30 years in jail. One year after his trial, Don admits that he withheld evidence that
would have cleared him. He states he did so to protect his twin brother, who actually
committed the crime, but who was dying of cancer at the time. He further states that he
did not want his brother to spend the last years of his life behind bars. His brother has
since died. The evidence is conclusive as to Don's innocence. Should the court set aside his conviction due to the new evidence?
What policies would support the court in not
doing so?
Answer:
Double jeopardy may prevent Don Long from being tried twice.
Don Long is convicted of second-degree murder for killing a woman he had been seeing over the last few months. The double jeopardy may prevent Don Long from being tried twice.
What is a sentence?A sentence is a set of words that are put together and which has meaning or makes complete sense of something. A sentence is the basic unit of language which expresses or makes a complete thought.
A sentence is formed by following the grammatical basic rules of syntax. For example:" John is running". A complete sentence has at least a subject and a main verb to state (declare) a complete thought. For example: Kate walks.
The first letter of the first word in a sentence will always be capital. At the end of the sentence there is a punctuation mark depending on whether it is a statement, a question, a command, a request or an exclamation.
Learn more about sentence here:
https://brainly.com/question/29140135
#SPJ2
Record the numbers of the correct responses from greatest to least. A forensic scientist will ask questions about: 1. Type of fiber. 2. Fiber color. 3. Number of fibers found. 4. Where the fiber was found. 5. Textile from which fiber originated. 6. The type of crime committed. 7. Time between the crime and the discovery of the fiber. 8. The number of fiber transfers. *
Answer:
The correct arrangement is given below:
Type of fiber Fiber color. The number of fibers found.Where the fiber was found. Textile from which fiber originated. The number of fiber transfers. The type of crime committed. The time between the crime and the discovery of the fiber.Explanation:
Type of fiber: This question tries to establish the nature of the fiber discovered, whether it is popular and what part of the crime scene it was found.Fiber color: this is usually analyzed to see if there is a match between the fiber on the victim and those on the suspect or from the suspect's residence or base of operationThe Number of fibers found: More fibers can be interpreted to mean that there was a prolonged period of contact between the victim and the suspect. It may also mean that there was a struggle between victim and suspect and or use of violence by the suspect.Where the fiber was found: This tells the forensic experts the extent of proximity between the suspect and the crime scene.Textile from which fiber originated: Source of fiber is critical. It tells the forensic scientist more about the crime scene. For example, if most of the fiber are those which may be found in on bedsheets, it may be insinuated that the crime scene was in a residential location.The number of fiber transfers: Multiple fibers exchanged between victim and suspect could mean that were was a long period of contact between them or that there was use of violence on the victim. The type of crime committed: Every type of crime will have an expected form of contact between the victim and the suspect. The manner of exchange of fibers will also reveal this.The time between the crime and the discovery of the fiber: The longer it takes to discover the trace evidence, the less reliable they become.
Cheers
The correct arrangement is given below:
1. Type of fiber
2. Fiber color.
3. The number of fibers found.
4. Where the fiber was found.
5. Textile from which fiber originated.
6. The number of fiber transfers.
7. The type of crime committed.
8. The time between the crime and the discovery of the fiber.
A forensic scientist Questions:
1. Fiber type: This question aims to determine the nature of the fiber identified, whether it is common, and where it was discovered at the crime scene.
2. Fiber color: this is frequently examined to see whether there is a match between the fibers on the victim and those on the suspect, or from the suspect's home or base of operations.
3. The total number of fibers discovered: More fibers could indicate that the victim and the perpetrator were in contact for an extended length of time. It could also indicate a struggle between the victim and the culprit, as well as the suspect's use of violence.
4. The location of the fiber: This informs forensic experts about the distance between the suspect and the crime scene.
5. Textile from which the fiber was derived: It is vital to have a fiber source. It provides further information to the forensic scientist regarding the crime scene. If the majority of the fibers are those found on bedsheets, for example, it could be assumed that the crime scene was in a domestic area.
6. The number of fiber transfers is as follows: Multiple fibers transferred between the victim and the culprit could indicate that they had been in contact for a long time or that the victim had been subjected to violence.
7. The type of crime committed: There will be an expected form of contact between the victim and the suspect in every sort of crime. This will also be revealed by the way fibers are exchanged.
8. The period between both the crime and the fiber's exploration: The longer it will take to find the evidence found, the less reliable it becomes.
For more information about A forensic scientist refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/22153642
5 Danny steals a debit card from the purse of Megan. The debit card
has an account balance of $5.00. What offense, if any, is Danny guilty
of?
Answer:
theft
Explanation:
because he is taking someone else's property. it doesnt matter if it was in the negatives. he would still be stealing someone else's property.
I have not been selected for a diversity visa twice and now I’m planning to apply for a student visa in Australia. Can I apply? If so, what are the chances of getting a visa?
The legal system of the 1800s depended on testimony regarding physical evidence from scientists of what profession?
Answer:
Pathology is the study of the effects of disease on the body, while forensic pathology studies the disease of crime.
Explanation:
Quizlet yeah
what do you think of the concept of leadership of Filipinos in general?
Answer:
They're very good and cautious
Which of these is an example of government corruption?
Answer:
Cronyism.
Explanation:
Answer:
cryonislism or however its spelt
Explanation:
can students get Married To school Teachers
They can!! When they are 18 of course. While it is a little weird to get married to someone who used to TEACH you, love has no boundaries (except it's a child then wth you p e d o)
The President can make a short term agreement with another country that lasts for the duration of his presidency without any approval. This type of agreement is called a(n)
treaty
amnesty
executive agreeement
bill
Answer:
executive agreement
Explanation:
sa tingin ko lang po
If Gloria threw a rock that hit Merle, she is liable for an intentional tort of battery only if she intended to injure or harm Merle.
Gloria is only accountable for an intentional tort of battery if she hurled a rock that struck Merle with the purpose to damage or injure him. This is a "false," statement.
How do intentional torts hold people liable or non-liable?Unintentional accidents that cause harm to people, property, or finances are known as accidental torts.
An unintended tort occurs when the individual who caused the accident did so unintentionally and often as a result of their lack of caution.
If the defendant did not intend to hurt the plaintiff, they cannot be held accountable in an intentional tort case. When someone intends to injure one person but mistakenly harms another, intent may have been transferred.
In order to hold a defendant responsible for an intentional tort, the plaintiff must establish both that the defendant committed the act that resulted in the damages they are alleging as well as that the defendant acted with purpose or that he knew with a high degree of certainty that the action would have an unlawful outcome.
The result of a person's intention to conduct a certain activity, regardless of any harm or damages that may ensue, is intentional culpability.
In other words, someone may plan to do something but not necessarily intend it to be harmful.
Learn more about intentional tort plaintiffs below;
https://brainly.com/question/28605645
#SPJ5
Full Question:
If Gloria threw a rock that hit Merle, she is liable for an intentional tort of battery only if she intended to injure or harm Merle. (T/F)
A flashlight with a rechargeable battery promises to work for 24 straight hours on a full charge. This guarantee of performance is considered a:
A.
warranty of merchantability
B.
express warranty
C.
implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose
D.
warranty contract
Answer:
b
Explanation: don't have one
example of institutional model
Answer:
I believe the answer would be every society have mainly five Social institutions such as family,government,religion,education, economics.
574 views
Explanation:
WILL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST ANSWER Writing accurately does NOT require which of the following?
A. Providing all relevant information
B. Writing specific and true information
C. Avoiding generalizations
D. Using complex words
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Because you can talk about anything in writing
Sabrina gave her dog to Lilly, Lilly asked Sabrina for her signature, Lilly went to pick up the dog, Sabrina still didn't sign the papers, Later Sabrina asked for her dog back, Lilly said no, can Sabrina get her dog back from Lilly?
Answer:
Yes, since the papers were not signed.
which two statements about retaliation are true ?
Retaliation is a deliberate action designed to send a strong message that complaining is undesirable and dangerous. It's being used to induce fear in those who may contemplate filing a complaint in the future.
Counterproductive behavior in reaction to unequal treatment is generally an attempt to restore justice by getting even with a person or organization and is referred to as revenge.The Spartans opted to retaliate, beginning the First Peloponnesian War.Managers are vulnerable to disciplinary measures if they engage in retaliation.Learn more about the retaliation:
brainly.com/question/12887443
Do you think issues like: Marriage rights and Abortion ought to be decided by: (1)Supreme Court (and therefore apply to ALL Americans the same), (2) have State Legislators vote and decide, or (3) have the voters in each state decide these issues? (There are three options here. Pick one and defend it against the other two.)
Please help
Reflections provide an occasion for insight and integration of the materials to which you have been exposed. They are also an opportunity to raise questions about course material. Your reflection should illustrate comprehensive understanding of the assigned material.
The stuff i learned Law deputy police , criminal cases, Criminology , Laws of the united States, issues with poverty and crime, and the world of corruption , k9's and police
What would the Realist say about holland's miracle?
What would the Anti-realist say about hollands miracle?
The correct answers to these open questions are the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say this.
Realists think that for a statement to be true, it has to deal with objective reality. On the other hand, anti-realists consider that any statement can is subjective and depend on the individual's beliefs. This means that it is directed related to the belief systems of the people who make the statement.
In the case of philosopher R. F. Holland, he has an anti-real consideration of miracles. He says that miracles are coincidences that religions interpret as miracles for their own conveniences. The key word here to understand Hllan's anti-realist perspective is "interpretation." He says that every single person is capable of making their own interpretations, thus it makes so personal.
Select the best answer for the question.
5. What was the approximate average annual cost of incarceration per prison inmate in 2012?
A. $15,600
B. $48,500
C. $30,700
O D. $8,300
Mark for review (Will be highlighted on the review page)
<< Previous Question
Next Question >>
what are the phases of investigation
The investigative process is a progression of activities or steps moving from evidence gathering tasks, to information analysis, to theory development and validation, to forming reasonable ground to believe, and finally to the arrest and charge of a suspect.
What is the exclusionary rule and how did it come to be? Given the advent of good-faith exceptions to the exclusionary rule, the plain-view doctrine, and the U.S. Supreme Court's recognition of the need for emergency searches, can we realistically argue that the exclusionary rule is still effective in contemporary American criminal justice? Has the exclusionary rule been so watered down by recent decisions as to be little more than a paper tiger? Defend your position.
Answer:
The exclusionary rule forbids most evidence obtained in violation of the Constitution of the United States from being used by the legislature. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio determined that evidence obtained from an arbitrary search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment is protected by the exclusionary clause.
Explanation:
What is community policing? How does it differ from traditional policing?
Which person is a victim of identity theft?
Suzie, whose e-mail was stolen and used to apply for a credit card from a major retailer
Michael, whose credit score was stolen and used to make a down payment on a home
Pam, whose smartphone was stolen and used to make a mortgage payment
Thomas, whose credit card information was stolen and maxed out at a jewelry store
Answer:
thomas
Explanation:
just did test
Thomas is a victim of identity theft because his credit card information was stolen and maxed out at a jewelry store.
What is identity theft?Identity theft happens when someone commits fraud or another crime using another person's personal information—such as their name, identification number, or credit card number—without that person's consent. In 1964, the phrase "identity theft" was first used. Since that time, both the U.K. and the U.S. have statutory definitions of identity theft that include the theft of personally identifiable information.
Identity theft purposefully utilizes someone else's identity as a technique to acquire financial advantages or obtain credit and other benefits, and potentially to create other person's disadvantages or loss. When someone's identity is stolen, bad things can happen to them, especially if they are wrongly accused of being the offender.
Therefore, Thomas is an victim of identity theft.
To learn more about identity theft, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29898436
#SPJ7
Help please?
Which of the following types of cases are more likely to involve the media and the potential for significant penalties?
misdemeanor cases
lower-level felony cases
upper-level felony cases
high-profile cases
Answer:
High profile case.
Explanation:
The media is more likely to be involved in high-profile cases. Simply because the defendant is well-known. Furthermore, upper-level felony cases can also have media attention, but not as much as HP cases.
How does having three branches of government make our lawmaking process fairer? Make sure to use the phrase “checks and balances” in your answer.
Jeronimo é empregado na sociedade empresaria Produtos baianos Ltda., exercendo a função de entregador. No ano em que completou 18 anos . Jeronimo se alistou e foi convocado para prestar serviço militar, permanecendo no quartel por um ano. Findo esse periodo deu a respectiva baixa e retornou ao serviço junto ao empregador.
I need an annotated bibliography about crime
I hope this helps! If it doesnt then just look it up on google i guess lol
Through a series of compromises the delegates were able to agree on the important points of the new plan. After its approval by the convention, the Constitution still had to be ratified by the states. The promise to add a Bill of Rights helped convince Anti-Federalists to approve the new government. In June 1788, New Hampshire became the ninth state to ratify the document and the Constitution took effect.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation did not solve some of the problems that the republic was going through and that was why it was necessary to create the federal constitution, which created and gave power to a unified government and which managed to suppress the problems and challenges that the country presented. However, the constitution had to be approved by the delegates of each state and not everyone was willing to approve it. A group of delegates called anti-federalists, believed that the constitution gave the president too much power and that was dangerous.
To have the support of anti-federalists, the federalists agreed to add a bill of rights to the new document, which ended up working.
In a criminal case, the prosecutor must prove the defendant’s guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt,” and in a civil case, the plaintiff must prove his case by a “preponderance of evidence.”
True or False