Answer and explanation:
First, he makes a winding path through the jungle, so to make Zaroff think that he went deeply into the woods ( Zaroff finds him right away). Next one - he makes what is called Malay mancatcher - he runs into a fallen tree which lies on a smaller non-cut tree, he makes a trigger, so whoever touches the trigger, it pulls him down and larger, a dead tree falls onto him (Zaroff just hurt his shoulder in this one). The third one is called the Burmese tiger pit. As Rainsford gets caught up in quicksand, he gets the idea of making this one. He digs a hole near quicksand and on the bottom of it, he puts sharp sticks and then covers it with branches and grass to hide it, so if Zaroff steps onto it, he will fall down and get stabbed (Zaroff`s hunting hound gets killed in this one). The fourth one was a trick that he learned in Uganda, in this one he uses his knife which he ties to a sprout, he points the knife to a path, and then with a grapevine he manages to connect the sprout with the trigger, so if Zaroff reaches the trigger, it will pull the knife and stab him and in this case that was the servant Ivan. The fifth one is the one mentioned in the question where Rainsford tricks Zaroff that he is dead by jumping to the sea. The final one is in Zaroff`s bedroom. He thinks that Rainsford is dead, but he is hidden in the curtains and when Zaroff comes to the bedroom, he surprises him and eventually kills him. So, there are four traps mentioned in the question that Rainsford uses to elude Zaroff, but it seems that only two served Rainsford to get away, and four were intended to hurt or kill Zaroff.
I hope this will help.
–5(–2) =
HAALP MEEEEEH
Answer:
+ 10
Explanation:
Hi !
-5(-2) = - 5 × - 2 = + 10
Good luck !
What comparison does the author develop through the poem
Answer:
Caedan
Explanation:
is it step by step explain
There are four main types of conflict. Many stories will have more than one type of conflict. Character vs. Character: It's the most common type of conflict in a story. This is any kind of struggle between two or more people. Character vs. Nature: This is when a character must overcome some natural obstacle or condition. Character vs. Society: A struggle against society occurs when a character is at odds with a particular social force or condition produced by society, such as poverty, political revolution, a social convention or set of values. Characters vs. Themselves: Within a character, parts of his or her personality may struggle for dominance. This conflict is usually about making a choice. In the story "Gregory and the Bees," a man must fight off a swarm of bees that lives in his attic. Which type of conflict is this?
Answer:
character vs nature
Explanation:
Answer:
nature and charecters
Explanation:
I agree with the other person and yes things are spellt wrong
a lae is a body _ with land around us
Do you mean a lake is a body __ with land around us?
If so, then look below. If not, then sorry-
Answer
of water
Explanation
Lake is filled with water that surrounds land. So it has to be a body of water with land around us.
Hope this helped! Sorry if I assumed wrong!
What is the best description of Buck's character, based on this excerpt? 1. Buck is peaceful and content.
2. Buck is strong and aggressive.
3. Buck is instinctive and clever.
4. Buck is easygoing and mellow.
Answer:
c. Buck is instinctive and clever.
Explanation:
just took the test.
15.3
__________________________ 18. True or False? Animals may use wetlands as nurseries, even if they do not live there permanently.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
does anyone know all the answers to the test called zoo that you take on performance matters? i need it and will give you brainliest
Answer:
no I do not
Explanation:
Which line in this poem best supports the theme that words can be both pleasing and harmful?
A Line 6
B Line 9
CLine 15
D Line 24
The answer is:
B. Line 9
write letter to your brother describinf about discipline
huh??????? can you be more specific
Which of the following is most likely explanation of how the structure of the poem contributes to its meaning?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Read the passage from "Mutability."
We are as clouds that veil the midnight moon;
How restlessly they speed, and gleam, and quiver,
Streaking the darkness radiantly!--yet soon
Night closes round, and they are lost for ever:
By contrasting “darkness” with “radiantly,” Shelley...
A. emphasizes that although life is fleeting, it is exciting.
B. compares the spark of creativity to the enduring night sky.
C. introduces the idea that people are destined to live life in darkness.
D. explains that people are permanent, bright fixtures like the heavens.
Answer:
Im almost positive it is A
Explanation:
By contrasting “darkness” with “radiantly,” Shelley emphasizes that although life is fleeting, it is exciting. This is a passage from "Mutability." Hence, option A is appropriate.
What is the meaning of the Passage?The Grammarly experts claim that most authors concur that a five-sentence paragraph is a solid general rule to go by. Five lines per paragraph give you room to create a complete thought without making it difficult for the reader to understand what it is you're trying to express.
The repository will expand with time. With this guarantee of an immediate end to the dim path, Jim quickened his sluggish movements. Sonya exited the hallway and headed for the barn.
The Grammarly experts claim that most authors concur that a five-sentence paragraph is a solid general rule to go by. A whole notion can be formed in five lines per paragraph without overwhelming the reader.
The length of a passage varies depending on the context and the goal of the extraction. A passage can be, for example, a sentence's clause, a few phrases, or a few pages.
Learn more about the Passage here:
https://brainly.com/question/18186625
#SPJ2
What is 3rd person objective?
The story is written
from the
perspective of the
main character in
the story.
The narrator is The narrator is The narrator is
outside of the story outside of the story outside of the story
but doesn't know and knows the and knows the
the thoughts or thoughts and thoughts and
intentions of the intentions of the intentions of all of
characters. main character the characters.
Answer:
Third-person objective point of view has a neutral narrator that is not privy to characters' thoughts or feelings. The narrator presents the story with an observational tone. The most popular example of third person objective is Hills Like White Elephants by Ernest Hemingway.
Which of the following websites is most likely a good source of credible information?
Answer:
C
Explanation:
chimichanga with monke sprinkled on it is the jam dude
can someone please help?
Answer:
i think letter c
Explanation:
The executive committee was unable to come to terms on the exact details of their proposed commerce bill; hdwever, the assembly
was forced to table its vote on the bill indefinitely
How should the underlined portion of the sentence MOST LIKELY be revised?
A)
NO CHANGE
B)
instead
otherwise
D)
consequently
Answer:
B) instead otherwise
Explanation:
i think so
ANSWER ASAP!!!! PLZZ
(WILL MARK BRAINLIEST) :D
Answer:
ok i'll help but need some basics:
Explanation:
1. Jesus called the pharisees "hypocrites". - "Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites!"
2. here's a quote from the bible to answer the rest:
Mark chapter 12
The *Pharisees’ question
Verses 13-17
There were three important groups who were against Jesus. They were called the *Pharisees, the Herodians and the *Sadducees.
The *Pharisees believed that the *Jews should obey all God’s *laws. And they wanted the *Jews to obey other rules too, which the *Pharisees’ leaders had made.
The Herodians seem to be friends of King Herod. The *Jews did not rule their own country. Instead, the king of Rome (called Caesar) ruled. But Rome is a long way from Israel. So Caesar had asked Herod to rule Israel on his (Caesar’s) behalf. But for a few years, Caesar had chosen a man called Pilate to rule there.
The *Sadducees were against the *Pharisees. We shall read about the *Sadducees in Mark 12:18-27. The most important *priests were all *Sadducees.
Jesus always taught people that they must obey God. So the *Pharisees came to Jesus with the Herodians. And they asked him whether he was against the government. Caesar demanded that people pay him money. The *Pharisees wanted to know whether people should pay that money.
The men who asked the question did not really want to know the answer. They were against Jesus. And they wanted the crowds to be against Jesus too. The crowds did not like Caesar. They thought that his government was cruel. But if Jesus told the people not to pay Caesar, then the Herodians would be against Jesus. And they could put Jesus in the prison.
Jesus did not have any money. So he asked the leaders to lend him a coin. And he looked at it. There was a picture of Caesar on the coin. And Caesar’s name was on the coin.
So Jesus told them that, clearly, the coin was Caesar’s. If he demanded his coin, then they should give it to him.
But our lives are God’s. He made us. He causes us to be alive. He gives us the things that we need. And he tells us that we must obey him.
So we should give our lives to God.
In the end, many *priests believed Jesus (Acts 6:7). Several *Pharisees believed him too (John 19:38-39; Acts 23:6).
Why was Richard II called the “lionhearted,” and how did he earn the name?
Answer:
Richard II was known as lionhearted because of his reputation as a great warrior and military leader.
Explanation:
He had earned the name lionhearted because by the age of 16 he had taken command and control of his own army, putting down rebellions in Poitou against his father.
I really hope this helped.
Richard II, called the “lionhearted,” are the because he was the great leader and the warrior and military leader. He was to earn the name was the command and control of his own army.
What is Richard II?
The Richard II was the born on the 6 January 1367 and the death was 14 February 1400. He was the king of the England. The Edward son was the name are the Richard II. He was the control the army. He was the also known as the Black king.
He was the man who earned the name "lionhearted" because he earned the public's reputation at a young age. At the age of 16, he was given command and control of his own army. Richard II was a good king who put down rebellions against his father in poison. He had earned the title of military commander. Richard II was known as the "lionhearted."
As a result, Richard II called the “lionhearted,” he was the earned the name on the age 16.
Learn more about on Richard II, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2591627
#SPJ5
how does ozymandias relate to history
Read the excerpt from Immigrant Kids, and then answer the question. Those who failed to get past both doctors had to undergo a more thorough medical exam. The others moved on to the registration clerk, who questioned them with the aid of an interpreter: What is your name? Your nationality? Your occupation? Can you read and write? Have you ever been in prison? How much money do you have with you? Where are you going? Some immigrants were so flustered that they could not answer. They were allowed to sit and rest and try again. What best paraphrases the central idea of the excerpt? What is your name? What is your job? are examples of questions the immigrants answered. Medical exams were frightening to the newcomers, so they had to sit down. If they had ever been in a prison, the immigrants were not allowed to stay in America. Immigrants were asked many questions before being allowed into the United States.
Answer:
Immigrants were asked many questions before being allowed into the United States.
Explanation:
Remember, the emphasis is on what best paraphrases the central idea of the excerpt. Hence our attention should be on what detail from the excerpt is most often stressed or elaborated on.
For example, from the excerpt, we observe an interesting detail that after the immigrants were asked several questions, "Some immigrants were so flustered that they could not answer." And the word "flustered" connotes one who is agitated or confused likely because of being asked several questions at a time.
Answer:
Immigrants were asked many questions before being allowed into the United States.
Explanation:
got 100
Which answer choice accurately describes the use of passive voice?
A. A verb in the passive voice is done for its subject.
B. A verb in the passive voice is done to its subject.
C. A verb in the passive voice is done without a subject.
D. A verb in the passive voice is done by its subject..
Verb in the passive voice is done for its subject is accurately describing the use of passive voice. Hence, option A is correct.
What is passive voice?A verb is said to be in the passive voice when it affects the sentence's subject. For instance, in the sentence "The ball was thrown by the pitcher," the verb was thrown is in the passive form, and the ball, the subject, acquires the action of the verb.
Whether a statement is in the passive voice can be determined by the verbs used. The formula for passive verbs is "be" verb form + past participle. The passive voice is frequently indicated in phrases with "by" before the person who really performed the deed, though this isn't always the case.
When the subject gets the action that the verb is conveying, the passive voice is used.
Thus, option A is correct.
For more information about passive voice, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/85850
#SPJ2
How would a book written by an anthropologist about an indigenous group of people be different from an autobiography of one of the people's elders?
Explanation:
A book written by an anthropologist would be less connected to the lives and culture of the people and therefore would be more factual, while an autobiography would be written more personally and include some aspects of the culture in a more specifically connected way.
What role reversal took place during the final illness of Eliezer’s father?
Answer:
During the final illness of Eliezer's father, the role reversal that took place was Eliezer took the responsibility of his father.
Explanation:
'Night' is a book written by Elie Wisel. The book recounts the real life incident in the life of Elie and his father.
Eliezer is an orthodox Jewish young boy of twelve years old. He daily meditates on scriptures in Torah, praying everyday, etc. Elie's father tried to maintain Jewish traidtion in his family.
In concentration camp, when Elie's father became ill and died, Elie took the responsibility to maintain the Jewish tradition in his family. This is the role reversal that took place when Eliezer's father became ill.
How did McDonald's change the restaurant industry? Provide text evidence to support your answer.
Answer:
The new-and-improved "Speedee Service System" impressed Chicago entrepreneur Ray Kroc, who initially visited the McDonalds to sell them milkshake makers. They ended up signing a deal for national franchise rights. The growth — both by McDonald's and the fast-food industry it has led — has transformed how people eat.
Plz help asap, this due at 4:30
Answer:
1. A
2.C
3.B
4.C
Explanation:
Answer:
a, c,b,c
Explanation:
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu. Complete these sentences about medieval plays. were short comedic plays that introduced real characters who were more fully developed than characters in allegories. These short plays helped to the mood in the midst of serious, instructive plays. Which of these statements is true about the play Everyman?
Answer:
Interlude: were short comedic plays that introduced real characters who were more fully developed than characters in allegories.
A). The fate of Everyman is destined.
Explanation:
The correct option to complete the given definition would be 'interlude.' Interludes are characterized as the plays that evolved from morality plays. It served as a transition between the morality plays of the medieval period and the Tudor drama. These were the 'short comedic plays' performed in the middle of serious plays or at banquets/aristocratic meetings for giving a break from the seriousness of the atmosphere and amuse the audience.
As per the question, the first option states a correct claim about the morality play 'Everyman' that the 'fate of Everyman is destined' i.e. 'his imminent death.' He represents the entire humanity and his struggle to prevent death and later to accept it symbolizes the human nature of evading the ultimate reality of human life i.e. their mortality. It is their deeds which define their judgment by god after death. Thus, option A is the correct answer.
which choice best describes buckes attitude toward the wolf?
Answer:
What are the choices?
Explanation:
Give me I will in a sentence plsss
Answer:
I will...
Explanation:
I will go to sleep.
I will eat.
I will go home.
Answer:
can u be more specific ʕ·ᴥ·ʔ
Explanation:
i do not understand your question ＼（＾○＾）人（＾○＾）／
Read the excerpt from Chapter 5 of Wheels of Change.
What conclusion can best be drawn from this synthesis
of new information with previously covered information?
Would the bicycle help bring about a new kind of equality
between men and women? Elizabeth Cady Stanton and
her colleagues certainly hoped so. At any rate, the image
of a female cyclist quickly became associated with
efforts to win more rights for women. When Cambridge
University in England decided to offer female students
full admission in 1897, the male students protested by
hanging a figure of a woman on a bicycle in effigy.
O The bicycle was successful in achieving equality
between the sexes.
England was ahead in its fight for equal opportunities
for women.
O Many people strongly opposed the increasing rights
of women.
Elizabeth Cady Stanton fought for a woman's right to
attend college.
Answer:
Many people strongly opposed the increasing rights of women.
Explanation:
The first and second options are incorrect, because the bicycle was not as successful as everyone hoped it would be, and the point of the excerpt is not that England was ahead in its fight for equal opportunities for women. The statement that Elizabeth Cady Staton fought for a woman's right to attend college is true, but the point is that many people strongly opposed the increasing rights of women despite the campaign.
Answer:
Many people strongly opposed the increasing rights of women.
Explanation:
Whats The answer I'll mark brainliest to the first ONE WHO GETS IT CORRECt
Answer:
B :)
Explanation:
Answer:
Your answer would be B
Explanation:
have a good Day!
To what extent is Lin Manuel Miranda’s portrayal of the relationship between Alexander Hamilton and Angelica schuyler accurate?
Answer:
Explanation:
Part of what Lin Manuel Miranda wrote in the musical Hamilton is imagined and part is true.
The parts he exaggerated are:
In a part of the song Satisfied where Angelica tells how she wants Hamilton despite him not being rich ("And Alexander is penniless / Ha! That doesn’t mean I want him any less"), she sings “I’m a girl in a world in which / My only job is to marry rich / My father has no sons so I’m the one / Who has to social climb for one)”. This part is not true, as her father had two sons. Angelica was already married and had children at the time of the initial meeting with Alexandar. These are not circumstances in the musical shows. Angelica didn’t probably introduce her sister Eliza to Hamilton. The historical evidence said that the pair likely knew each other from before.
However, the true parts are:
Angelica likely had a small crush on her brother in law. In one of the letters, she wrote to Eliza: “If you were as generous as the old Romans, you would lend him to me for a little while,” a line that was partly used in the musical. Angelica wrote to Hamilton as to her “dear and naughty Brother” in one of the letters. Hamilton probably returned these affections. In one of the letters, he wrote to Angelica “I seldom write to a lady without fancying the relation of lover and mistress.” He also frequently returned her compliments.Hamilton and Angelica had a close and affectionate relationship, even flirting a bit. This is also seen through their letters in which they describe their affection, missing each other. Their conversations are witty and flirtatious. Historians explain this kind of communication was possible exactly because they were both married. They were likely friends joking with each other, but it would be scandalous if the public saw this type of relationship between man and woman if they were single and not in their separate relationships.Therefore, we can conclude that Miranda did exaggerate the circumstances of Angelica’s and Hamilton’s relationship, but he did not invent the attraction and affection between them.