Which three statements describe how Russia influenced the 2016 presidential election in Donald Trump's favor?
Answer: Russian hackers sent phishing emails to a business firm to gain access to voter information.
Russian operatives stole documents from email servers in an effort to discredit their opponent.
Russian agents created social media accounts to spread negative information about their opponent.
PLEASE HURRY
Read this excerpt from the Preamble to the United States Constitution:
United States. Preamble and First Amendment to the United States Constitution. (1787, 1791) Preamble
We, the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the
general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution of the United States of America.
How did the 15th, 19th, and 26th Amendments expand the "Blessings of Liberty" to more of the United States population? Write a short essay of 5 to 7 sentences to
explain your answer.
Answer: We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Explanation:hope this helps
Supporters of Manifest Destiny believed it was their right
A. to maintain peaceful relations with other countries.
B. preserve traditional ways of making a living.
C. take over Indigenous lands and expand the nation.
D. live in harmony with Indigenous peoples..
Answer: The supporters of Manifest Destiny believed that it was their destiny and right by God and history to expand. Taking lands from non-European Americans was justified because they were spreading liberty to the lands and the natives were racially unfit to hold the lands.
Explanation:
hope it helps
Answer:
C. take over Indigenous lands and expand the nation.
Explanation:
Which group did the United States eventually side with in World War I?
A. only Britain
B. the triple entente
C. the triple alliance
D. the ottoman empire
Answer:
C. The Triple Entente
Explanation:
(Britain, France, Russia)
36. Intelligence efforts should focus on the group's:
A. Membership.
C. Stated and unstated goals.
B. Resource base.
D. All of the above
Read this article about quarterly growth in GDP in the United States since 2011. As you read the article, you’ll see many economic terms we have not yet discussed. Don’t worry, you'll learn about all of them soon. For now, here’s a brief description of what you need to know for this activity:
A quarter is a three-month period:
first quarter: January to March
second quarter: April to June
third quarter: July to September
fourth quarter: October to December
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the total value of finished goods and services produced during a year in a country.
Consumer spending is the total amount spent by consumers across the country.
Business investment is the total amount spent by companies to gain profits.
A trade deficit occurs when a country has more imports than exports.
Business inventory includes the value of the goods that have been produced by companies but not yet bought by consumers.
Question 1
Using what you read in the article, answer the following questions.
Part A
Did GDP increase or decrease in the second quarter of 2018? By how much did it increase or decrease?
According to the article about quarterly growth in GDP in the United States since 2011, the GDP in the second quarter of 2018 increased by 3.2%.
What is the GDP growth rate?The GDP growth rate is the year-over-year (or quarterly) change in the United State's economic output, measured in percentage.
Using the GDP growth rate, it becomes possible to measure how fast an economy is growing.
Thus, we can conclude that based on the article, the GDP in the second quarter of 2018 increased by 3.2%.
Learn more about GDP growth rate at https://brainly.com/question/1690575
#SPJ1
why did general macarthur address congress after he was fired?
Answer:
He wanted to thank Americans for treating him as a hero.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!!!
what are at least two of the book’s themes in jubilee
Answer:
One theme is: longing for freedom and acceptance.
Another theme: is the struggle for justice.
Explanation:
1. Jubilee is a story about longing for freedom and acceptance. Many enslaved people, like Vyry, aspire to be free. In the story, they are freed from slavery, but they are not equal. Even after her family had been released, the neighbors continued to look down on them. They had little political clout, so the Ku Klux Klan attacked several people, including members of Vyry's family, in order to keep them silent.
2. The struggle for justice is another recurring theme in the book. Slaves, free blacks, and even some whites battled for the liberation of slaves in various ways.
For further details on themes:
https://brainly.com/question/12840206
#SPJ1
Two major themes in Jubilee are forgiveness and justice.
What is the book, Jubilee?Margaret Walker's Jubilee focuses on an enslaved woman and follows her through the antebellum period, the Civil War, and Reconstruction.
What are the themes in Jubilee?Jubilee by Margaret Walker contains many themes. Some of them include forgiveness, freedom, justice, acceptance, Sabbath, liberty, celebration, and journeying together.
Jubilee celebrates the significance of the continuing restoration of Christian unity.
In Jubilee, one finds freedom and liberation from the past strongholds.
What are the themes in a literary work?The themes in a literary work give the central message or idea that the writer wants to convey to the readers.
Thus, two major themes in Jubilee are forgiveness and justice.
Learn more about themes at brainly.com/question/12840206
#SPJ1
Which statement best completes the diagram to show how the agricultural
revolution affected Indigenous groups?
People adopt farming
techniques and settle in a
single region.—>>> HELP
Option C. The sentence that shows the way that the agricultural revolutions' affected the indigenous societies was that people formed complex societies.
What was the agricultural revolution?This was the term that was used to refer to the revolution that took place in Europe most especially in Great Britain. In this time period, what happened was that people started to grow food in large quantities and there was the abundance of food.
This helped to make the people richer and also helped to reduce the poverty that was prevalent in the area. The agricultural revolution happened because the people were able to start growing crops using a a different approach to agriculture. Hence improving yields.
During the agricultural revolution the people were able to shift from living the nomadic and the hunting lifestyle to building complex societies and civilizations.
Read more on the agricultural revolution here:
https://brainly.com/question/24674970
#SPJ1
Answer:
After agricultural revolution the shift from nomadic lifestyle to farming helped Indigenous groups build more complex civilizations.
Explanation:
Correct out of 4 multi-choices
Select the correct answer.
What is absolute advantage?
A.
having a lower opportunity cost to produce goods than other firms or nations
B.
having a lower cost of production than other firms or nations
C.
having more available resources for producing a good than other nations
D.
having fewer or no trade barriers for international trade than other nations
Answer:
B. Having a lower cost of production than other firms or nations.
Explanation:
In the seventeenth century, economic inquiry emerged as a separate science. But that didn't just happen overnight. The process of crude conceptualization and creation of political economic concepts had long before started to emerge.
Commodity, exchange, money, pricing, loan interest, commercial profit, and other economic concepts were already familiar to ancient Egyptians, Greeks, Hindus, and other peoples.
Ancient Egyptian papyri, the Hammurabi Code, the Vedas of Ancient India, Homer's Odyssey and other works of the ancient Greek poet, Xenophon, Plato, Aristotle and other philosophers of Greek antiquity, etc., all include a wealth of information and ideas that are quite intriguing.
The ancients had very rudimentary knowledge of economic concepts.
The history of economic thought starts with the writings of Xenophon, Plato, and particularly Aristotle, who made the first theoretical step towards an understanding of the economy of ancient Greek society (which was at the stage of the collapse of the primitive-communal system and the rise of slavery) and articulated some remarkable ideas on value, commodity exchange, and the earliest forms of capital: trading (merchant's) and usury capital.
In the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, commerce and monetary activities rather than manufacturing were where capitalist institutions initially emerged.
Eventually, this development of the future capital became known as Mercantilism, which represented the interests of the capital of the merchants in England, Italy, and France. The main spokespersons for it were Thomas Mun and William Stafford in England, Antonio Serra in Italy, and Antoine de Montchrestien in France.
The French mercantilist Antoine de Montchrestien first used the phrase "political economy" in his Treatise of Political Economy (1615), which offered advice on how to manage the state economy and increase the nation's riches. The phrase, which originally meant "the laws of state administration," was derived from three Greek words: "politikos" (state, social); "ikos" (home or its management); and "nomos" (rule of law).
The Physiocrats—Francois Quesnay, Turgot, and others—developed bourgeois political economics later, in the seventeenth century. French economist François Quesnay belonged to the Physiocratic school. He is renowned for publishing Tableau économique (Economic Table), which laid the groundwork for the Physiocrats' theories, in 1758. French statesman Turgot, Baron de l'Aulne, also known as Turgot, was greatly inspired by Quesnay and was also an economist in his own right.
They changed the focus of economic inquiry away from the domain of circulation and toward the sphere of production, in opposition to the mercantilists.
Karl Marx observed in 1859 in the section 'Historical Notes on the Analysis of Commodities' in A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy: 'The decisive outcome of the research carried on for over a century and a half by classical political economy, beginning with William Petty in Britain and Boisguillebert in France, and ending with Ricardo in Britain and Sismondi in France, is an analysis of the aspects of the commodity into two forms of labour – use-value is reduced to concrete labour or purposive productive activity, exchange-value to labour-time or homogeneous social labour.' In Capital (1867) he defined political economy: '… by political economy I understand the economy which since the time of W. Petty has investigated the real relations of production in bourgeois society'.
Marx made a distinction between such men as Petty, Smith and Ricardo and their successors. He wrote of the former that they devoted their efforts 'to the study of the real interrelations of bourgeois production', while the latter were 'content to elucidate the semblance of the interrelations' and to act in effect as apologists for the capitalist class. He called them 'vulgar economists'.
Engels had already warned, and shown great foresight, in 1843 when he wrote in his Outlines of a Critique of Political Economy: 'The nearer to our time the economists whom we have to judge, the more severe must our judgment become. For while Smith and Malthus found only scattered fragments, the modern economists had the whole system complete before them: the consequences had all been drawn; the contradictions came clearly enough to light, yet they did not come to examine the premises and still accepted the responsibility for the whole system. The nearer the economists come to the present time, the further they depart from honesty'.
Answer:
See image
Explanation:
Plato
Under communist theory, what determines how much of each good and service is supplied?
Supply
Demand
Community central planning
The invisible hand of the market
Under communist theory, Community central planning determines how much of each good and service is supplied.
Community central planning entails that the government owns and distributes the factors of production and hence they determine how much of each good and service is supplied.
What is Communism?Communism is a system of government where the factors of production such as land, labor etc. are firmly under the control of the government.
This type of economy is also referred to as command economy.
In communism, the government determines how much of a good or service that will be supplied because they control the factors of production that drives commerce.
Learn more about Communism at https://brainly.com/question/12173354
#SPJ1
What was the underlying principle of Roman law?
a. The concept of social justice
b. The concept of natural rights
c. The protection of citizens' lives and property
d. The prevention of social and political upheaval
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Because it is the concept of natural rights
Answer: D
Explanation: HI HOPE THIS HELPS YOU
Is religion and god created by man ?
Answer:
religion is made by man based on belief of the god in said religion, it ultimately opinion based.
while there are books dating far back they could just be the equivalent what a mad man's scribbled in a book dating back.
there is no solid proof that gods exist, religion is man made.
How did the economic boom of the 1920s affect labor unions?
.
Answer:
Unions in the 1920s were harmed by rising wages which made it harder to attract new members.
16. Why does a majority of the population in South America reside on the coastlines of the continent?
The majority of the population in South America resides on the coastlines of the continent because most of the cities are near the coast.
What are the benefits of residing near the coastline?Living near the coastline is very beneficial. It gives you productive fisheries and many opportunities, and it protects you from storms and there are many other benefits of the same.
Most South American cities are located near the coastlines. This is because of the physical geography of the continent. That's why the majority of the population in South America are residing on the coastline of the continent. They also leave near the coastline because of easy availability of transportation.
Thus, this is the reason why a majority of the population in South America is residing on the coastlines of the continent.
To learn more, refer to: https://brainly.com/question/21190856
#SPJ9
As a result of the "corrupt bargain" of 1824, Andrew Jackson
O became the president.
O became secretary of state.
O formed a new political party.
O formed a new cabinet position.
Answer:
a. became the president
Explanation:
As a result of the corrupt bargain of 1824, Andrew Jackson became the president
Kong Rong (153-September 26, 208), courtesy name Wenju. He was from the State of Lu (governing present-day Qufu, Shandong). A writer in the late Eastern Han Dynasty, one of the "Seven Sons of Jian'an", his family origin is the twentieth grandson of Confucius, the son of Kong Zhou, the magistrate of Yuancheng (now Daming County, Hebei) and the captain of Mount Tai. Few talents, diligent and eager to learn, and Pingyuan Tao Qiuhong and Chen Liubian are also called handsome. After Emperor Xian of the Han Dynasty ascended the throne, he was appointed as the mid-waiter of the Northern Army, the general of the Tiger Ben, and the prime minister of Beihai, and was called Kong Beihai at that time.
Action: Follow my work ethics and report the situation, but emphasize the lady's sincere attempts in the report. My report should emphasize the person's shift in attitude and responsibility, not her transgression. For her own benefit and the good of her children, I must persuade authorities to assist the woman get a job or establishing her own business.
Professional vs. personal ethics. I'm sympathetic to the cause, but duty comes first. I must serve a wider purpose, therefore I'll do my job.
What are the ethical issues?Discrimination, harassment, unethical accounting, technology misuse, data privacy, health and safety, and favoritism and nepotism are among the most often encountered ethical challenges.
In conclusion, Individual morals vs. professional standards. I sympathize with the cause, but my responsibilities demand that I put them ahead of it. I have a responsibility to the greater good, therefore I'll perform my job.
Read more about ethical issues
https://brainly.com/question/13529138
#SPJ1
The women's suffrage movement organized people to fight for voting rights.
What details should the writer include in the essay to support the thesis?
O opinions about how voting should be carried out by states
arguments about why the voting age should have been lowered in the 1800s
statistics that show the growth and impact of the women's suffrage movement
stories about the families of key figures in the women's suffrage movement
The women's suffrage movement organized people to fight for voting rights was a decades-long fight to win the right to vote for women in the United States.
Women's suffrage movement:
The women's suffrage movement fought for women's voting rights in the United States for many years. It took activists and reformers nearly a century to obtain that right, and the struggle was not without difficulty: disagreements over tactics often put the movement at risk of collapse.
The suffragist movement was divided. The National Woman Suffrage Association is started by Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton. The organization's main objective is to grant women the right to vote by a Congressional amendment to the Constitution.
As a result, women gradually began to realize that achieving the change to end women's suffrage can only be successful once they have the ability to vote.
Learn more about the women's suffrage movement here:
https://brainly.com/question/1441724
#SPJ1
Answer:
The women's suffrage movement organized people to fight for voting rights was a decades-long fight to win the right to vote for women in the United States.UnitedUnited
Explanation:
Directions: View the image on the previous page to complete this Note Taking Guide.
1.
Observation: Study the image for two minutes. Form an overall impression of the image and then examine individual items. Next, divide the image into quadrants and study each section to see what new details become visible.
2.
Observation: Use the chart below to list people, objects, and activities in the image.
People
Objects
Activities
3.
Themes: Give two examples of how this photo montage represents one of the identified themes of postwar art.
It is to be noted that the attached image is an example of a pre-WWI art form called Dadaism. This art form influenced the Surrealist in the post war period. The title of the attached image is "Cut with the Kitchen Knife through the Last Epoch of Weimar Beer-Belly Culture in Germany"
What are the people that are visible from the image?Modern women placed side by side with women in traditional rolesSlavesWhat are the objects in the image?1. There are symbols of modernity such as
carslight bulbs2. Symbols of Industrialization such as;
BoresGears WheelsOther symbols such as
An Elephant3. Activities
Some of the example of how the photo relates to postwar art are:
Learn more about Dadaism at;
https://brainly.com/question/27609646
#SPJ1
Which element of the 2011 Arab Spring uprising in Libya best illustrates the
idea of cultural diffusion?
OA. News of rebellions in Tunisia and Egypt helped inspire Libyan
rebels to launch the uprising.
B. The United States played a major role in convincing NATO to help
end the uprising.
OC. Libyan dictator Muammar al-Qaddafi attempted to suppress the
uprising with violence.
D. Radical Islamic terrorist organizations from outside Libya
organized and led the uprising.
The idea of cultural diffusion is best illustrated during the Arab Spring uprising because news of rebellions in Tunisia and Egypt helped inspire Libyan rebels to launch the uprising.
It is important to note that the world is intertwined, and hence countries are affected by events which occur in other countries.
Therefore option A is correct
What was the Arab Spring Uprising?The Arab Spring uprising was a series of anti-government protests, events, and armed rebellions that started and spread across much of the Arab world in the early 2010s having its roots in Tunisia.
The events of the Arab spring began as a response to corruption and economic stagnation which was initiated in Tunisia in North Africa and spread through most of the Arab world.
The Arab spring reminds us that nations of the world are bound together and that events which happen in one country may spread to other parts of the globe.
Learn more about Arab Spring at https://brainly.com/question/810543
#SPJ1
The English would become the dominant power in North America by 1750. What features were common to ALL of the English southern colonies and which were unique to just South Carolina, Vlrginia, or Maryland?
(Please remember that you must find things unique for all of the colonies and then for just the 3!)
The English would become the dominant power in North America by 1750.. They all depended on slaves and indentured laborers to cultivate their fields. This is further explained below.
What are English southern colonies?Generally, Maryland, ∨irginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia were the southern colonies.
In conclusion, Until 1750, the English had dominated North America. For the most part, their farms were staffed by freed slaves or indentured servants.
Read more about English southern colonies
https://brainly.com/question/9622005
#SPJ1
Unit Activity: Social Studies Concepts
Consider the growth of the country during the 1800s. Use the map and your knowledge of the time period to answer the
following questions:
Part A
Is there a general trend in the direction of the territories acquired?
Answer:
manifest destiny
Explanation:
Manifest destiny was a widely held cultural belief in the 19th-century United States that American settlers were destined to expand across North America
The United States was bent on reaching the Pacific Coast and so kept expanding westward by acquiring territory until they achieved their goal.
westward expansion
following lewis & clarks expedition
https://brainly.com/question/25100145
wikipedia
Answer:
manifest destiny
I dunno how to explain
Why was it important to Spanish colonists that their slaves did not know the
terrain of the land?
A. They would be more willing to grow foreign crops on the land if
they knew little about it.
B. They would be less likely to realize how terrible the working
conditions were if they were in a new land.
C. They would be more likely to convert to Christianity if they were
transported to a new place.
D. They would be less likely to run away from the plantations if they
were unfamiliar with the land.
Answer:
Explanation:
D: Except for the most hardy and most courageous of slaves, the answer is definitely D.
C: I don't think they would be more likely to convert. The Jesuits had a terrible time trying to convince people of the "new world" to convert to Christianity, especially if they already had a religion. New World means newly discovered by the Europeans who were interested in profit and colonization and not necessarily the church. It depends on what era you are asking about.
B: I don't really think so. The lay of the land was not on the mind's of the slaves when considering working conditions. Rebellion and murder might have been more to the point.
A: I don't see how to eliminate this one. It is simply wrong. Agricultural techniques was simply not on their mind.
Answer
D
Which is a result of Squanto’s negotiations with colonists?
Colonists and the Wampanoag form an alliance as a result of Squanto's negotiations with them.
Squanto was from a hard-working, resourceful village. His tribe's women raised corn, beans, and squash while the men went on fishing expeditions up and down the coast. The Patuxet people and the European immigrants typically got along before the early 1600s, but it didn't endure for very long.
The Wampanoag chief Massasoit negotiated an alliance with the Pilgrims, promising not to harm one another, with the help of Squanto serving as interpreter. In the case of an attack from another tribe, they also pledged to support one another. Squanto was referred to by Bradford as "a particular tool sent of God."
Learn more about Squanto's negotiations from here
https://brainly.com/question/28122643
#SPJ1
Now Moses kept the flock of Jethro his father-in-law, the priest of Midian: and he led the flock to the backside of the desert and came to the mountain of God, even to Horeb. And the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush: and he looked, and, behold, the bush burned with fire, and the bush was not consumed. And Moses said, I will now turn aside, and see this great sight, why the bush is not burnt. And when the Lord saw that he turned aside to see, God called unto him out of the midst of the bush, and said, Moses, Moses. And he said, Here am I.”
—Exodus 3:1–6,
Holy Bible
What was Moses’s work that took him out into the desert?
a.
shepherd
c.
angel
b.
prophet
d.
farmer
What evidence did the commission find that made it change the name of the ""tulsa race riot"" to the ""tulsa race massacre""?.
Evidence of The commission found :
That 300 African-Americans—not 26—had been killed. It also found that city officials had provided firearms and ammunition. This was no uprising or it was a slaughter.Why the Tulsa Race Riot named?In recent years there has been ongoing discussion about what to call the event that happened in 1921. Historically, it has been called the Tulsa Race Riot. Some say it was given that name at the time for insurance purposes. Designating it a riot prevented insurance companies from having to pay benefits to the people of Greenwood whose homes and businesses were destroyed. It also was common at the time for any large-scale clash between different racial or ethnic groups to be categorized a race riot.
What is The RIOT?A tumultuous disturbance of the public peace by three or more persons assembled together and acting with common intent.
What is The MASSACRE?The act or an instance of killing a number of usually helpless or unresisting human beings under circumstances of atrocity or cruelty.
Learn more about Riot Vs Massacre on:
brainly.com/question/23910042
#SPJ4
Was the Patriot Act Patriotic or Unconstitutional? Why or why not? Give a few examples. Has to be at least a paragraph.
Answer: The patriotic act was not unconstitutional, it only expanded on the rights of law enforcement to combat acts of terrorism and money laundering.
Explanation:
The purpose of the USA Patriot Act is to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world. Section 314 helps law enforcement identify, disrupt, and prevent terrorist acts and money laundering activities by encouraging further cooperation among law enforcement, regulators, and financial institutions to share information.
The purpose of the USA Patriot Act is to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world. Section 314 helps law enforcement identify, disrupt, and prevent terrorist acts and money laundering activities by encouraging further cooperation among law enforcement, regulators, and financial institutions to share information.
Source: Director of National Intelligence
https://www.dni.gov/index.php/who-we-are/organizations/ise/ise-archive/ise-additional-resources/2116-usa-patriot-act
How did the New Deal live up to the "American promise?" How did it fail?
Answer:
However comprehensive the New Deal seemed, it failed to achieve its main goal: ending the Depression. In 1939, the unemployment rate was still 19 percent, and not until 1943 did it reach its pre-Depression levels.
Imagine that the president has deployed forces to intervene in a civil war in the Middle East. The purpose of the deployment is to protect the civilians in a large city from an imminent attack by their own government. The president claims that this urgent use of military force falls within the powers of the presidency as commander in chief, but does not reach the level of involvement that requires Congress to declare war. The president does not formally consult with Congress before ordering military action and does not provide a report to Congress in a timely manner.
In response, the House Armed Services Committee declares that the president violated the War Powers Act, demands that the president remove the troops, and formally brings the case to the Supreme Court to force action from the president.
You are a justice on the Supreme Court preparing to hear the case. Start by writing down your initial reactions to the situation. Based on what you know of the War Powers Act, which branch appears to be in the right? What questions would you ask during oral arguments to try to get each side to explain its point of view?
Imagine that the president has deployed forces to intervene in a civil war in the Middle East. The purpose of the deployment is to protect the civilians in a large city from an imminent attack by their own government. The president claims that this urgent use of military force falls within the powers of the presidency as commander in chief, but does not reach the level of involvement that requires Congress to declare war. The president does not formally consult with Congress before ordering military action and does not provide a report to Congress in a timely manner.
In response, the House Armed Services Committee declares that the president violated the War Powers Act, demands that the president remove the troops, and formally brings the case to the Supreme Court to force action from the president.
You are a justice on the Supreme Court preparing to hear the case. Start by writing down your initial reactions to the situation. Based on what you know of the War Powers Act, which branch appears to be in the right? What questions would you ask during oral arguments to try to get each side to explain its point of view?
Imagine that the president has deployed forces to intervene in a civil war in the Middle East. The purpose of the deployment is to protect the civilians in a large city from an imminent attack by their own government. The president claims that this urgent use of military force falls within the powers of the presidency as commander in chief, but does not reach the level of involvement that requires Congress to declare war. The president does not formally consult with Congress before ordering military action and does not provide a report to Congress in a timely manner.
In response, the House Armed Services Committee declares that the president violated the War Powers Act, demands that the president remove the troops, and formally brings the case to the Supreme Court to force action from the president.
You are a justice on the Supreme Court preparing to hear the case. Start by writing down your initial reactions to the situation. Based on what you know of the War Powers Act, which branch appears to be in the right? What questions would you ask during oral arguments to try to get each side to explain its point of view?
According to the War Powers Act, the President is required to inform Congress of any military operations he plans to take within 48 hours. If the United States is attacked or seriously threatened, the President may use military action abroad with the approval of Congress and under the authority of the War Powers Act. If the President fails to inform Congress within 48 hours and get permission, the decision might be challenged and overturned. In my capacity as a judge, I must inquire of the President as to why he chose not to inform Congress of his decision.
Good questions to ask are
How strict is the standard of review on appeal, and what does it indicate for the scope of this court's review?Where do you excel the most? When there are two or more viable bases for a ruling, which one do you hope the court will choose, and why?What specific remedy are you seeking, and on what basis does the court have the power to award it?What is oral arguments?Generally, In a court of law, a case may be presented via oral argument.
In conclusion, For this case congress is correct.
Read more about oral arguments
https://brainly.com/question/15266611
#SPJ1
What was the main reason why did African kingdoms start
capturing and selling slaves to Europeans?
A. In exchange for manufactured goods such as firearms
B. To eliminate their enemies
C. For money
D. They were pressured to by European powers
Reset Selection
Answer: I believe b is the answer
Explanation: