Which translation of the
murdering Duncan?
passage best explains Macbeth's reasoning for not
• A. When we commit a crime, we teach others by our actions, and
often the teacher is killed in the end.
• B. I wanted to poison the king, but my wife thought it would be better
to stab him so we could blame the guards.
•
C.
am very afraid to commit this horrible act, but I will do it because
I really want to become the king.
•
D. must kill the king quickly before I lose my nerve and decide not to
go through with it at all.

Answer:

The answer is B: Compound

Answer:

B compound

Explanation:

Answer:

The boy's dog was hit by a car and has not been to school for 3 days.

Answer:

D

Explanation:

i did the test edg 2021

Answer: I look forward to your response.

Have a good day

Answer:

reliance

Explanation:

reliance

Answer:

lowest is agriculture and the highest is education

Explanation:

hope it help

The employment sector that contains the maximum number of workers and the lowest number of workers would be as follows respectively.:

- Agriculture - Maximum Number of workers

- Education - Lowest number of workers

Learn more about 'Sectors of the Economy' here:

brainly.com/question/2551787

Answer:

. (1.) Then it happened.

Answer:

2

Explanation:

I think 2 because, it seems like a good place to break it off, then continue with    the rest of the story.  

Answer:

True

Explanation:

prefix= un+reasonable

suffix=unreason+able

hope it helps you

Mark me as brainlist

Answer:

In “My Two Lives” Jhumpa Lahiri talks about her hardship growing up in America coming from two different cultures. At home she spoke Bengali with her parents, ate with her hands. According to Jhumpa’s parents she was not American and would never be. This led her to become ashamed of her background. She felt like she did not have to hide her culture anymore. When Jhumpa got married in Calcutta she invited her American friends that never visited India. Jhumpa thought her friends would judge from being part of the Indian culture and isolate her.However her friends were intrigued by her culture and fascinated. She felt like her culture should not be hidden from her friends anymore, and that coming from an Indian-American culture is unique. Jhumpa believes that her upbringing is the reason why she is still involved with her Bengali culture. Jhumpa says“While I am American by virtue of the fact that I was raised in this country, I am Indian thanks to the efforts of two individuals.” Jhumpa means that she is Indian, because she lived most of her life and was raised here. In the story Lahiri explains that her parents shaped her into the person she is. Growing up coming from two different cultures can be difficult, but it can also be beneficial.

Answer:

The poem opens with an oxymoron - the speaker calls self Nobody

Explanation:

Answer:

hey

Explanation:

Answer:

threatening, foreboding is correct.

Answer:

•Personification.

Explanation:

Personification is the giving of human attributes to non-living things. This means that non-animate things, ideas, etc. are given human characteristics making them seem alive.

In the given lines from her poem "The New Colossus," Emma Lazarus used the figurative language of personification. Here, she describes the Statue of Liberty as a living mother, having "mild eyes". This personification is also seen in the use of the pronoun "her" in "her beacon-hand", referring to the lamp/ torch that the statue holds.

Thus, the correct answer is personification.

Answer:

Explanation:

A. Thanksgiving

Answer:

I really don’t know what u mean by that may u explain?!

Explanation:

Answer: c. It highlights the negative impact of arrogance.

Explanation:

There is no source attached but this is most probably correct because of the story of Arachne and Minerva.

Arachne was a very skilled weaver who became arrogant enough to challenge Minerva, the goddess of of weaving. Arachne beats Minerva in a weaving contest and taunts her.

This drive the goddess to rage and ends with Arachne being transformed into a spider for all eternity showing that arrogance can have negative consequences.

Answer:

I think it means that when the drones are in the sky they basically spy on u and possibly the person who is controlling the drone put a camera on it sorry tried my best hope I helped a little?

A claim made by the author of "Drones Put Spying Eyes in the Sky" is that Drones can monitor endangered species and track poachers.

A drone is a flying robot that does not require a pilot on board. The United States military has used drones and other unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for surveillance.

The basic rationale for putting spying drones in the skies is that Snitch believed that if the drone could spot the animals, it would expose the existence of any questionable characters nearby. If it did spy on him, he might alert a nearby park ranger. That armed ranger may then apprehend the would-be poacher and save the animals.

Thus, it can be said that a claim made by the author of "Drones Put Spying Eyes in the Sky" is that Drones can monitor endangered species and track poachers.

Learn more about drones, here:

https://brainly.com/question/30741818

#SPJ6

Answer:

okpuoooiiiiiii800099009999999999999

Answer:

She's not looking forward to it because she thinks the twins are mischievous.

Explanation:

Whatever we make of the substance of Judge Andrew Rutherford's ruling in the Cornish private hotel case, his citation of a striking and controversial opinion by Lord Justice Laws – delivered in another religious freedom case in 2010 – is worth pausing over. The owners of the Chymorvah hotel were found to have discriminated against a gay couple by refusing them a double-bedded room. They had appealed to their right to manifest their religious belief by running their hotel according to Christian moral standards. Given the drift of recent legal judgments in cases where equality rights are thought to clash with religious freedom rights, it is no surprise that the gay couple won their case.

But quite apart from the merits of the case, judges should be warned off any future reliance on the ill-considered opinions about law and religion ventured last year by Lord Justice Laws. Laws rightly asserted that no law can justify itself purely on the basis of the authority of any religion or belief system: "The precepts of any one religion – any belief system – cannot, by force of their religious origins, sound any louder in the general law than the precepts of any other."

A sound basis for this view is Locke's terse principle, in his Letter on Toleration, that "neither the right nor the art of ruling does necessarily carry with it the certain knowledge of other things; and least of all the true religion".

But Laws seemed to ground the principle instead on two problematic and potentially discriminatory claims. One is that the state can only justify a law on the grounds that it can be seen rationally and objectively to advance the general good (I paraphrase). The question is, seen by whom? What counts as rational, objective and publicly beneficial is not at all self-evident but deeply contested, determined in the cut and thrust of democratic debate and certainly not by the subjective views of individual judges. Religiously inspired political views – such as those driving the US civil rights movement of the 1960s or the Burmese Buddhists today – have as much right to enter that contest as any others. In this sense law can quite legitimately be influenced by religion.

Laws' other claim is that religious belief is, for all except the holder, "incommunicable by any kind of proof or evidence", and that the truth of it "lies only in the heart of the believer". But many non-Christians, for example, recognise that at least some of the claims of Christianity – historical ones, no doubt, or claims about universal moral values – are capable of successful communication to and critical assessment by others. Laws' assertion is also inconsistent with his own Anglican tradition, in which authority has never been seen as based on the subjective opinions of the individual but rather on the claims of "scripture, tradition and reason" acting in concert.

Answer:

You must find out - what's meaningful to you? What about big problems in today's society, such as abortion, immigration, or even the wall Trump is establishing?

When you pick your topic, just go at it. Here's mine

Explanation:

Throughout history, there have been many problems that have striked pure interest in me. However, in particular, I would say that I feel rather passionate about immigration.

The issue of immigration has been in the limelight for a long period of time now. The most affected region being the United States of America which forms the destination of most immigrants. Immigration generally entails people moving from their native lands to other destinations where they end up settling. There are various reasons as to why people decide to leave their land and move to other regions. Some of which include search for employment, political uproars, and natural disasters just to mention but a few.

The immigrants who get into another country are broadly classified into two groups that are the legal and illegal immigrants. Legal immigrants are those seek the authorization from the immigration department of the state’s government on entering the nation. That way, they possess legal documents and become just like the citizens of that nation.

Illegal immigrants on the other hand are people who enter the borders of a nation without proper immigration procedures and choose to remain in that country without permission. Therefore the problem of immigration is usually caused by the illegal immigrants and not the legal ones. This paper is therefore a synthesis of the issue of immigration especially in the United States where it is most prevalent.

Just feel free to expand! Make yourself empowered.

Hope this helps.

Answer:

the answer is non researchable

Explanation:

Answer:

Censorship is when an article, piece of information, or person (reporter/journalist in this case) is deliberately manipulated or hidden away to keep things under wraps. Bribery can be a part of censorship. Some governments actively perform censorship, for example, when a journalist wants to write an an article about a mayor stealing away government money, but the someone bribes them with money and "favors", so the journalist writes an article about the park the mayor helped build (could be called propaganda).

Hope this helps you out! Have a fantastic day! :)

and this is the correct answer and you can go for it

all the best

THIS IS SO HARD

HELP

GUYS

IMMA BOI WHO BORED

AND IN MATH CLASS

BBOISE

Answers:

It should be Headings

Answer:

hxnfvv

Explanation:

hvkln

Answer:

The civil rights movement was a fight for equal rights under the law for African Americans during the 1950s and 1960s.

Explanation: